2021
DOI: 10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0027.204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of S-LOMS and Comparison Between Hong Kong and Singapore of Student Developmental Outcomes After Service-Learning Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the psychometric properties, including underlying dimensionality and internal consistency, were tested via EFA and CFA with a sample of 400 university students from four Hong Kong institutions ( Snell and Lau, 2020 ), reporting a strong internal consistency with a Cronbach’s α value of 0.96. Then, the scale was validated again with another group of students, this time from Singapore ( Lau and Snell, 2021 ). To ensure the construct validity could be maintained, an EFA was conducted for both pre-experience and post-experience data, and the results confirmed a single-factor model with factor loadings over 0.82.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the psychometric properties, including underlying dimensionality and internal consistency, were tested via EFA and CFA with a sample of 400 university students from four Hong Kong institutions ( Snell and Lau, 2020 ), reporting a strong internal consistency with a Cronbach’s α value of 0.96. Then, the scale was validated again with another group of students, this time from Singapore ( Lau and Snell, 2021 ). To ensure the construct validity could be maintained, an EFA was conducted for both pre-experience and post-experience data, and the results confirmed a single-factor model with factor loadings over 0.82.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students self-assess their competencies before and after the learning experience with items on a 10-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree; 10: strongly agree). The instrument and has been rigorously validated in the local context, achieving satisfactory criterion validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency (Lau & Snell, 2020, 2021). The current study uses four learning domains: knowledge application (four items) and problem-solving skills (four items), which address students’ intellectual learning, and empathy and caring for others (three items) and sense of social responsibility (three items), which capture students’ civic learning.…”
Section: Research Framework and Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%