22nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference and Exhibit 2004
DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-4837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Inlet and Exhaust Boundary Conditions for a Cartesian Method

Abstract: Inlets and exhaust nozzles are often omitted in aerodynamic simulations of aircraft due to the complexities involved in the modeling of engine details and flow physics. However, the omission is often improper since inlet or plume flows may have a substantial effect on vehicle aerodynamics. A method for modeling the effect of inlets and exhaust plumes using boundary conditions within a n inviscid Cartesian flow solver is presented. T h i s a p proach couples with both CAD systems and legacy geometry to provide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use primitive variables to simplify the presentation. The full implementation and discussion of these boundary conditions is given by Rodriguez et al, 14 extending earlier work by Pandya et al 24 Here we give only the main results to set the stage for discussing the corresponding adjoint, or dual, boundary conditions in Section V. For subsonic outflow through the wetted surface, e.g., when simulating engine inlets, the boundary state is constructed from one user-specified quantity, either exit pressure p set or normal velocity U n,set . All other quantities are taken from the interior, i.e., from within the computational domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We use primitive variables to simplify the presentation. The full implementation and discussion of these boundary conditions is given by Rodriguez et al, 14 extending earlier work by Pandya et al 24 Here we give only the main results to set the stage for discussing the corresponding adjoint, or dual, boundary conditions in Section V. For subsonic outflow through the wetted surface, e.g., when simulating engine inlets, the boundary state is constructed from one user-specified quantity, either exit pressure p set or normal velocity U n,set . All other quantities are taken from the interior, i.e., from within the computational domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…4 This type of boundary condition is not available in the inviscid solver, so plumes are modeled with uniform inflow boundary conditions at the nozzle throat, and the flow solver is responsible for producing the correct nozzle exit profile. 7 The Cart3D flow solver is constrained to a single-species perfect gas assumption. Isentropic flow relations are used to adjust the nozzle throat diameter and mean flow nozzle conditions.…”
Section: Nozzle Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies mainly focused on flow behavior inside and downstream of exhaust nozzle, whereas, the actual nozzle flow characteristics and performance is quite different when propulsion system and aircraft external flow interaction with exhaust plume is taken into account. Effect of jet exhaust plume on control surfaces of aircraft and change in pitching and yawing moments are also important in determining the stability parameters of aircraft (Pandya, et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%