2016
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Individual-Based Markov-Like Stochastic Process Model of Insect Behavior and a “Virtual Farm” Concept for Enhancement of Site-Specific IPM

Abstract: The paper reports application of a Markov-like stochastic process agent-based model and a "virtual farm" concept for enhancement of site-specific Integrated Pest Management. Conceptually, the model represents a "bottom-up ethological" approach and emulates behavior of the "primary IPM actors"-large cohorts of individual insects-within seasonally changing mosaics of spatiotemporally complex faming landscape, under the challenge of the local IPM actions. Algorithms of the proprietary PESTonFARM model were adjust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fairly uniform environments, generic population models, mostly based on “random diffusion” paradigms (Rudd and Gandour, 1985 ; Kot et al, 2004 ; Liebhold and Tobin, 2008 ; Roques et al, 2008 ), largely explain the growth and spread of the initial populations, and estimate the relation between propagule pressure and probability of establishment (Memmott et al, 2005 ; Colautti et al, 2006 ; Drake and Jerde, 2009 ). But at the ultra-low densities and fine spatial scales of the species-typical daily exploration ranges, translocations of the individual insects are determined by the proximate configurations of environmental attributes and transient availability of resources, and thus are far from random (Lux, 2014 ; Manoukis et al, 2014 ; Lux et al, 2016 , 2017 ). It is broadly recognized that during the initial cryptic “latency phase,” such small cohorts may linger for some time undetected (Sakai et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fairly uniform environments, generic population models, mostly based on “random diffusion” paradigms (Rudd and Gandour, 1985 ; Kot et al, 2004 ; Liebhold and Tobin, 2008 ; Roques et al, 2008 ), largely explain the growth and spread of the initial populations, and estimate the relation between propagule pressure and probability of establishment (Memmott et al, 2005 ; Colautti et al, 2006 ; Drake and Jerde, 2009 ). But at the ultra-low densities and fine spatial scales of the species-typical daily exploration ranges, translocations of the individual insects are determined by the proximate configurations of environmental attributes and transient availability of resources, and thus are far from random (Lux, 2014 ; Manoukis et al, 2014 ; Lux et al, 2016 , 2017 ). It is broadly recognized that during the initial cryptic “latency phase,” such small cohorts may linger for some time undetected (Sakai et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confronted with the paucity of experimental options, we propose the individual-focused “ethological” approach (Lux, 2014 )-stochastic simulation of lifetime events and behaviors of “virtual” individual members of the incipient cohorts, operating under hypothetical agro-ecological scenarios of varying complexity and climates. Such in silico emulation of the pest-landscape system offers unique possibility to capture the wealth of information about behavioral particularities of the target insect species, and reflect the impacts of the local conditions with their spatiotemporal dynamics at insect-relevant scales (An et al, 2009 ; Lux et al, 2016 ). Importantly, for very small populations scattered at ultra-low densities, such an approach permits more realistic reflection of the individual stochastic uncertainty and non-random behavioral mechanisms of the choices made in locally heterogeneous environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the search for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) tools, an efficient marking methodology can be an important instrument. MRR, MR, and MC studies can be used for assessing (seasonal) dispersal [31,70,73,[79][80][81][82] or estimating population sizes [83,84] and can assist in the development of preventative strategies, better targeted control measures or prediction models [85]. MR and MRR studies can also be useful for determining trapping parameters in the development of monitoring [30,[86][87][88] and mass trapping strategies [89].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%