1995
DOI: 10.1117/12.228940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of FASE (FASCODE for the Environment) and MODTRAN3: updates and comparisons with clear-sky measurements

Abstract: FASE is a line-by-line (LBL) atmospheric radiation code, grounded in the original USAF FASCODE (Fast Atmospheric Signature Code) line shape decomposition algorithm. The Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program and the AF/PL Geophysics Directorate jointly supported FASE which now envelops both agencies' important upgrades. ARM's LBLRTM (LBL Radiative Transfer Model authored by S.A. Clough and P.D. Brown of AER, Inc.) expanded the FASCODE algorithms to specifically address scientific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several ways to estimate R ld : (1) direct measurements by the pyrgeometers in weather stations (Wang and Liang, 2009); (2) simple physical or empirical models using the screen height measurements of the air temperature and the air humidity usually measured in most weather stations (Sridhar and Elliott, 2002;Duarte et al, 2006;Kjaersgaard et al, 2007;Choi et al, 2008); and (3) more sophisticated radiative transfer models such as LOWTRAN, MODTRAN, and STREAMER incorporated to estimate the reliable actual emission and absorption process in the atmosphere (Kneizys et al, 1988;Snell et al, 1995;Key and Schweiger, 1998). The direct measurements of R ld using pyrgeometers are challenging due to the high cost of the measurement instruments compared to those of surface shortwave radiation using pyranometers (Sridhar and Elliott, 2002;Duarte et al, 2006;Wang and Liang, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several ways to estimate R ld : (1) direct measurements by the pyrgeometers in weather stations (Wang and Liang, 2009); (2) simple physical or empirical models using the screen height measurements of the air temperature and the air humidity usually measured in most weather stations (Sridhar and Elliott, 2002;Duarte et al, 2006;Kjaersgaard et al, 2007;Choi et al, 2008); and (3) more sophisticated radiative transfer models such as LOWTRAN, MODTRAN, and STREAMER incorporated to estimate the reliable actual emission and absorption process in the atmosphere (Kneizys et al, 1988;Snell et al, 1995;Key and Schweiger, 1998). The direct measurements of R ld using pyrgeometers are challenging due to the high cost of the measurement instruments compared to those of surface shortwave radiation using pyranometers (Sridhar and Elliott, 2002;Duarte et al, 2006;Wang and Liang, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lacking the required data and measurements noted above, R ld can be calculated using screen height measurements of air vapor pressure and temperature from weather stations via simple physical or empirical models [ Sellers , 1965; Idso and Jackson , 1969; Brutsaert , 1975; Satterlund , 1979; Sugita and Brutsaert , 1993; Prata , 1996; Crawford and Duchon , 1999; Rizou and Nnadi , 2007]. More reliable R ld estimation can be obtained by radiative transfer models such as MODTRAN [ Snell et al , 1995]. However, required input data such as vertical profiles of temperature and air vapor are not typically available [ Niemela et al , 2001; Duarte et al , 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clear‐sky downwelling longwave irradiance at the surface can also be estimated using radiative transfer model such as SBDART [ Ricchiazzi et al , 1998], MODTRAN [ Snell et al , 1995], LOWTRAN [ Kneizys et al , 1988] by taking into account actual emission and absorption phenomena in the atmosphere. To be accurate and to represent actual conditions, radiative transfer calculation require realistic input data (i.e., temperature and humidity profile, aerosol properties) at each time step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%