2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterizing daytime downward longwave radiation in two Korean regional flux monitoring network sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(101 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the Brutsaert model was determined to be the most applicable model considering statistical errors, A, B, and R 2 values, which were well-supported by several previous studies (Sridhar and Elliott 2002;Duarte et al 2006;Kjaersgaard et al 2007;Choi et al 2008;Choi 2013). In the case of the Satterlund model the statistical errors were slightly lower than those from the Brutsaert and Prata models.…”
Section: R Ld From Flux Towerssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the Brutsaert model was determined to be the most applicable model considering statistical errors, A, B, and R 2 values, which were well-supported by several previous studies (Sridhar and Elliott 2002;Duarte et al 2006;Kjaersgaard et al 2007;Choi et al 2008;Choi 2013). In the case of the Satterlund model the statistical errors were slightly lower than those from the Brutsaert and Prata models.…”
Section: R Ld From Flux Towerssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The Bias and RMSE were -17.03 and 31.71 W m -2 at the SMK site, and 10.79 and 20.70 W m -2 at the CFK site, respectively. For these results the Abramowitz model demonstrated the best performance compared to the other models (Choi 2013). Choi (2013) estimated point-based daytime R ld by various physical or empirical models at two Korean regional flux sites and introduced performances of the Abramowitz model.…”
Section: R Ld From Flux Towersmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the FluxPro program (Hong et al 2009) was used for data QC measured from the flux tower. The FluxPro program has been widely used for successful QC in various studies, because it contains standardized QC steps (i.e., Coordinate rotation, air density correction, and spike detection) by adapting QC steps proposed by FLUXNET to KoFlux datasets (Choi 2013;Choi et al 2010;Hong et al 2008Hong et al , 2009Hong et al , 2014. For coordinate rotation, the FluxPro program adopts the planar fit rotation (PFR) which is recommended in complex terrain (Lee et al 2006;Wilczak et al 2001).…”
Section: Preparation Of Eddy Covariance Datamentioning
confidence: 99%