7.1 Paediatric Respiratory Physiology and Sleep 2015
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.pa4148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of commercial devices for measurement of lung clearance index (LCI) and functional residual capacity (FRC) in school-aged children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 How- ever, it is also admitted that the commercial multiplebreath nitrogen washout device used in this study overestimates true FRC to such an extent that some authors even report higher FRC washout than FRC pleth . [35][36][37][38] The mechanism behind this remains unclear, but because we found a small positive bias toward higher FRC pleth , we assume that substantial volumes of gas were trapped in a number of our subjects. The relatively high values observed in RV and RV/TLC, both markers also traditionally utilized to represent gas trapping, 34,39 and their positive associations with the magnitude of the bias (ie, FRC pleth Ϫ FRC washout ) further support this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 How- ever, it is also admitted that the commercial multiplebreath nitrogen washout device used in this study overestimates true FRC to such an extent that some authors even report higher FRC washout than FRC pleth . [35][36][37][38] The mechanism behind this remains unclear, but because we found a small positive bias toward higher FRC pleth , we assume that substantial volumes of gas were trapped in a number of our subjects. The relatively high values observed in RV and RV/TLC, both markers also traditionally utilized to represent gas trapping, 34,39 and their positive associations with the magnitude of the bias (ie, FRC pleth Ϫ FRC washout ) further support this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%