Validation of Bangla Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRSB)

Soron, Tanjir Rashid

doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2017.03.019

Cited by 16 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The survey comprised four multiple choice questions on clinical tests: common clinical tests such as observation of posture; range of motion; neurological tests; muscle strength; muscle length; segmental movement of spinal segments; repeated movements according to Mechanical Diagnostics and Therapy (MDT) [30]; palpation for pain; examination of range of motion in nearby joints and the abdominal draw in maneuver while palpating for activity in the deep abdominals [31], as well as various tests used for observing movement control impairment [9,32]. Risk of chronicity € Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening [45] or Start Back Screening Tool (STaRT) [46]; Self-efficacy (self-efficacy scale) [47]; Anxiety/depression [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [48], Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) [49], Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) [50], Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) [51].…”

Section: Questions On Use Of Various Clinical Testmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain – a survey among primary health care physiotherapists

Östhols

Boström

Rasmussen-Barr

2018

Disability and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our findings show that physiotherapists working in primary health care use clinical testing in LBP to a great extent, while various patient-reported outcome measures are used to a low-to-very-low extent. Several barriers to the use of patient-reported outcome measures were reported such as time, knowledge, and administrative issues, while important findings on advantages were to enhance the clinical reasoning process and to educate and motivate the patient. Barriers might be changed through education or organizational change-work. To enhance the use of patient-reported outcome measures and thus person-centered care in low-back pain, recommendation, and education on various patient-reported outcome measures need to be advocated. Implications for rehabilitation To increase the effects of rehabilitation in low-back pain, yellow flags, and other factors need to be taken into the consideration in the assessment which means the use of patient-reported outcome measures in addition to clinical testing. The use of patient-reported outcome measures is an advantage in the clinical reasoning process to enhance the quality of assessment and to educate and motivate the patient. Barriers to use patient-reported outcome measures are mainly lack of time and knowledge, and administrative aspects. Through education or organizational change-work, barriers to the use of patient-reported outcome measures might be changed.

show abstract

Section: Questions On Use Of Various Clinical Testmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain – a survey among primary health care physiotherapists

Östhols

Boström

Rasmussen-Barr

2018

Disability and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, we need a reliable tool in Bangla to measure the severity of depression to combat this most common mental health problem. As specific laboratory investigation is lacking to confirm the diagnosis and severity assessment for depression (Soron, ), validated Bangla version of a rating scale for depression assessment like Beck Depression Inventory‐II (BDI‐II) could meet this requirement.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent years, researchers of Bangladesh and West Bengal of India have given scientific endeavors to translate and validate few internationally accepted scales to measure depression into Bangla, for example, Bangla version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21‐item (DASS21‐BV) (Alim et al, ), Bangla Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRSB) (Soron, ), and Bengali adaptation of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS‐B) (Gausia et al, ; Maity, Saha, Sanyal, & Biswas, ). As DASS21‐BV is a multidimensional scale that was validated only among medical students, its use among the patient is uncertain.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Bangla version of Beck Depression Inventory‐II

Alim

Ahmed²,

Mullick

et al. 2020

Brain and Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Beck Depression Inventory (BDI‐II) is a widely used valid instrument to assess the severity of depression in clinical and normal settings. To meet the necessity of a standard scale for measuring depression among above 265 million Bangla speaking population around the world, this scale was translated and validated. Methods Two translations of BDI‐II into Bangla were prepared, and then, two back translations were done by medical and language experts in parallel. Thereafter, sentence revision followed by pretest on 20 respondents was done to finalize the Bangla version of BDI‐II (BDI‐II BV). Afterward, a cross‐sectional, comparative, and descriptive study was conducted to validate the scale by purposive sampling technique consisting of 111 persons (both clinical and normal) in three tertiary‐level hospitals in Bangladesh. Everyone was given to fill up BDI‐II BV at first. Then, they were given to fill up BDI‐II BV (n = 49), Bangla version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21‐item (DASS21‐BV, n = 47) and BDI‐II (n = 25) 3–7 days later. The diagnosis of depressive disorder was made according to DSM‐5. Correlation study and factor analysis were completed. Results The mean age was 28.83(±8.70) years. The male–female ratio was 1:0.82. Correlation of scores for BDI‐II BV with the DASS21‐BV depression subscale was .920; BDI‐II BV with BDI‐II was .985 (Cronbach's α .993; t test not significant) and BDI‐II BV applied first and the second time was .960 (Cronbach's α .979; z test not significant). The interitem correlation for all the items was found highly significant (p < .01). Patients having depressive disorder or episodes had significantly higher BDI‐II BV scores than normal (M + SD 30.18 + 10.127 than 8.34 + 5.910; p < .001). Partial confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated two‐factor loading comprising Cognitive and Somatic‐affective symptoms. Conclusions Through the translation and validation process, a validated Bangla version of BDI‐II was produced to measure depression and its severity among the Bengali population.

show abstract

“…For the first testing correlation is r=0.96 (p<.001), and for the retest is r=0.94 (p<.001). (17) .866* SUM (10) .878* * Correlation is significant at the .001 level…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Some studies reported that the construct of the MADRS might be represented by two to three factors underlying different depressive symptoms, such as dysphoria, retardation, and vegetative symptoms (8,9), which should be considered in evaluating depression treatment. Good reliability and validity were also reported for the MARDS in different language versions, such as Bangla (10), Brazilian (11), Chinese (12), French (13), Korean (14), Malay (15), Persian (16), Spanish (17; 18), and Thai (19).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale in clinical practice: Psychometric properties on Serbian patients

Vojvodić

Andonov²,

Stevanović³

et al. 2020

VOJNOSANIT PREGL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The aim of this study was to analyze the measurement properties of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Serbian version for quantifying depression severity in the clinical setting. Methods: Two studies have been conducted in order to validate MADRS. The first study had sixty-four adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), with test-retest situation, and the second one had 19 participants (also with MDD), who had six test-retest situations. Psychometric evaluation included descriptive analysis, internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity (correlations with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-HAMD-17). Results: The internal consistency for test-retest reliability was 0.93 in total for MADRS, and for six testretest situations was 0.95. MADRS has one factor structure, with explained variance of 66.26% for the first testing, and 61.29% for the retest. There are statistical significant correlations between MADRS and HAMD-17 (r=0.96 for test and r=0.94 for retest). Also, it has been shown great correlation between all items on MADRS, and for instrument in total (r=.89). Conclusion: MADRS has shown good statistical results, and it could be used in everyday clinical practice for discriminating MDD.

show abstract

Validation of Bangla Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRSB)

Cited by 16 publications

References 25 publications

Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain – a survey among primary health care physiotherapists

Clinical assessment and patient-reported outcome measures in low-back pain – a survey among primary health care physiotherapists

Validation of the Bangla version of Beck Depression Inventory‐II

Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale in clinical practice: Psychometric properties on Serbian patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About