2019
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an individualized reduction of falls intervention program among wheelchair and scooter users with multiple sclerosis

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Demographic and clinical characteristics, frailty-related measures, and history of falls (i.e., number of falls experienced in the previous six months) were collected during a single assessment. The study consisted of a secondary analysis of baseline data collected as part of a multi-center non-randomized clinical trial focusing on a personalized fall prevention intervention (Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03705364) [12]. Participants had to meet the following inclusion criteria: a) aged 18 years or older, b) confirmed diagnosis of MS according to the revised McDonald's diagnostic criteria 2017 [13], c) patient determined disease steps (PDDS) score of 7.0 (i.e., use of a wheelchair as primary form of mobility), d) self-reported ability to transfer independently or with minimal/moderate assistance, e) self-report of at least one fall in the previous 12 months, f) able to understand written and spoken English.…”
Section: Study Design Setting and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demographic and clinical characteristics, frailty-related measures, and history of falls (i.e., number of falls experienced in the previous six months) were collected during a single assessment. The study consisted of a secondary analysis of baseline data collected as part of a multi-center non-randomized clinical trial focusing on a personalized fall prevention intervention (Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03705364) [12]. Participants had to meet the following inclusion criteria: a) aged 18 years or older, b) confirmed diagnosis of MS according to the revised McDonald's diagnostic criteria 2017 [13], c) patient determined disease steps (PDDS) score of 7.0 (i.e., use of a wheelchair as primary form of mobility), d) self-reported ability to transfer independently or with minimal/moderate assistance, e) self-report of at least one fall in the previous 12 months, f) able to understand written and spoken English.…”
Section: Study Design Setting and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Falls often happen when there is a mismatch between the environment, your body, and the activity. 6 Managing the different parts of fall risk can help you avoid falls. Often that means you need to plan ahead.…”
Section: What Can You Do To Prevent Falls?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years important advances in evidence-based fall prevention and management programs designed for pwMS who use wheelchairs and scooters as their primary form of mobility have been made. Specifically, a single session, 45-min intervention created by Rice et al (9) resulted in improvements in transfer quality, postural control, and reduction in fall frequency. Building upon that success, Rice et al (10) created the Individualized Reduction of FaLLs-In Person (iROLL-IP) program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individualized Reduction of FaLLs (iROLL) program content is evidence-based (10). Specifically, the developers of the intervention drew extensively from their research to identify and address circumstances of falls among individuals who use a wheelchair or scooter (e.g., MS symptoms, environmental hazards, activity curtailment associated with fear of falling) (2, 7,9,14). Individualized Reduction of FaLLs-In Person includes concise didactic instruction on these topics, as well as exercises to improve sitting balance and core strength, and content designed to build wheelchair/scooter and transfer skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%