“…In order to construct scales or questionnaires with items of high psychometric quality, researchers must engage in many activities aimed at building initial versions of the instrument items and then repeatedly revise them to improve their performance (e.g., Kanter, Mulick, Busch, Berlin, & Martell, 2007;Lehmann-Willenbrock & Kauffeld, 2010;Lu & Gilmour, 2006;Murray, Booth, McKenzie, & Kuenssberg, 2015). These psychometric activities may be classified into several categories: (a) activities involved in development of initial item pool based on content validity (e.g., Beauchamp et al, 2010;Kessler, Andrews, Mroczek, Ustun, & Wittchen, 2006;Lu & Gilmour, 2006), (b) analysis of factor structure of items with respect to construct validity, including convergent and divergent validity, item biases, and measurement invariance (e.g., Ferrer, Balluerka, & Widaman, 2008;Hughes, Betka, & Longarzo, 2018;Storch, Rasmussen, Price, Larson, & Murphy, 2010;Walker, 2010;Williams & Polaha, 2014), (c) analysis of criterion-related validity (e.g., Klassen et al, 2009), and (d) analysis of reliability (e.g., Funk, Huebner, & Valois, 2006). Among these psychometric activities, most of them use quantitative methods to examine item behavior or property in the analysis.…”