2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a universal prehospital termination of resuscitation clinical prediction rule for advanced and basic life support providers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
89
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2015 American Heart Association (AHA) as well as the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) describe basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) rules for termination of resuscitation (TOR) (2). Several studies have evaluated the generalizability of the TOR rules in BLS and ALS emergency medical services (EMS) systems ( Table 1) (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). The BLS TOR rule suggests that resuscitative efforts may be aborted in patients whose arrest was not witnessed by EMS, in whom return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is not achieved in the field and when no shocks are delivered ( Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2015 American Heart Association (AHA) as well as the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) describe basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) rules for termination of resuscitation (TOR) (2). Several studies have evaluated the generalizability of the TOR rules in BLS and ALS emergency medical services (EMS) systems ( Table 1) (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). The BLS TOR rule suggests that resuscitative efforts may be aborted in patients whose arrest was not witnessed by EMS, in whom return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is not achieved in the field and when no shocks are delivered ( Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Compared to cardiac etiology OHCA patients, drowning patients in Ontario were more often transported to hospital, which is most likely attributable to the fact that drownings are excluded from the application of termination of resuscitation guidelines. 20,21 Drowning patients were more often admitted to hospital alive compared to cardiac OHCA patients, although there was no difference in survival to hospital discharge. This increase in short-term survival could be explained by the relatively public nature of drownings, which predominantly occur outside or in a shared space and are thus more likely to attract a crowd response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Treated cardiac arrests of presumed cardiac etiology were eligible for prehospital termination of resuscitation after paramedics consulted with an online medical director or base hospital physician based on a previously validated tool for any unwitnessed arrest, with no defibrillator shocks delivered and no return of spontaneous circulation. 20,21 The resuscitation of drowning OHCA patients was terminated only after direction from the online medical director or base hospital physician as OHCA attributed to drowning falls outside the termination of resuscitation protocol.…”
Section: Setting and Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37][38][39][40][41] This decision rule provided the first scientifically validated evidence to guide prehospital providers as to when it is safe to terminate resuscitation. Similar rules to terminate in-hospital resuscitation do not exist, yet these prehospital derived rules may serve as a guideline for termination of the unwitnessed in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.…”
Section: Termination Of Resuscitationmentioning
confidence: 99%