Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure an Organization’s Potential for Happiness

Velázquez, Rafael Posada; Rascón, Oscar Cuauhtémoc Aguilar; Soto, Ricardo Contreras

doi:10.18848/2327-8013/cgp/v12i02/59256

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Within this group, the dominance of studies from hedonic happiness perspective could clearly be seen (e.g. Meng and Liang, 2011; Posada et al. , 2013; Lee et al.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Within this group, the dominance of studies from hedonic happiness perspective could clearly be seen (e.g. Meng and Liang, 2011;Posada et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2015;Reichert, 2017;Larsen, 2017;Pulker et al, 2019;Baluyot and Caluza, 2021;Siahaya and Smits, 2021;Khan et al, 2021;Ilyas et al, 2022;Lin, 2022). The research studies on eudaimonic happiness (e.g.…”

Section: An Overview Of Csr and Happiness Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Coalescence of CSR and happiness for corporate sustainability: a systematic review of literature

Kıymalıoğlu

Özbük

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe study aims to understand how corporate social responsibility (CSR) and happiness are used together in various research studies to serve the ultimate goal of corporate sustainability (CS), which in turn contributes to sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachA systematic literature review (SLR) was made using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) method in the two most-reputable databases of Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus, revealing a final list of 54 studies to analyse.FindingsThe review concludes that the literature on CSR and happiness provides three main findings: first, concerning the pillars of sustainability, most of the studies concentrate on people, neglecting the planet and profit, second, employees are subject to the highest number of studies as the target of CSR initiative and third, almost all studies employed the hedonic aspect of happiness in CSR literature.Research limitations/implicationsThis particular research finding points to the need for developing a comprehensive framework to assess stakeholder happiness from both hedonic and eudaimonic aspects from a CSR perspective which is then represented under the three pillars of sustainability.Practical implicationsTo contribute to the ultimate goal of CS, management would design CSR initiatives for all stakeholders to increase both hedonic and eudaimonic happiness of them.Originality/valueThe literature provides reviews of research in CSR and happiness separately; however, there is not any research revealing how these two concepts are used together in studies and how this association could be read to serve the goal of CS.

show abstract

“…Within this group, the dominance of studies from hedonic happiness perspective could clearly be seen (e.g. Meng and Liang, 2011; Posada et al. , 2013; Lee et al.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%