Validation of a Portuguese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile adapted to people with mild intellectual disabilities (OHIP-14-MID-PT)

Couto, Patrícia; Pereira, Paulo Almeida; Nunes, Manuel Lourenço; Mendes, Rui Amaral

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198840

Cited by 7 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Afterwards, a CFA analysis of model showed the following fit indexes (χ2 (df) = 285.49 [77]; TLI = 0.93, CFI = 0.94, and RMSEA = 0.12, with all standardized regression weights being statistically significant (ranging 0.63-0.95; p < 0.01). On the same sample was also tested the model of seven correlated factors ( 15 , 16 ) with the following fit indexes obtained: χ2 (df) = 174.14 [56]; TLI = 0.94, CFI = 0.97, and RMSEA = 0.11. In addition, the model with three correlated factors proposed by Zucoloto et al .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the oral health impact profile - 14 in patients with head and neck cancer

Tesic

Čanković²,

Jevtić³

et al. 2020

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) was designed to assess patients’ perception of the impact of oral disorders on their quality of life (QoL). Although the OHIP-14 is now frequently used in patients with head and neck cancer, data related to its measurement properties in this population are scarce. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the OHIP-14 in a sample of Serbian patients with head and neck cancer. Material and Methods Data were available for 345 patients (257 [74.5%] males; aged 30-92 years), with head and neck cancer. All patients completed the OHIP-14 and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35. Factor analyses, internal consistency reliability (i.e., Cronbach’s α coefficient), and construct validity were analyzed. Results The factor analyses confirmed that 14 OHIP items were measuring a single underlying factor. Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.98 and corrected item-total correlations ranged 0.77-0.93. Lower OHIP-14 scores (i.e., lower impacts on oral health) were more frequently present among patients who had only surgery as a therapeutic procedure compared to those who had surgery accompanied with radio- and chemotherapy ( p < 0.01). Patients with a tumor stage 0-II also had lower OHIP-14 scores compared to those who had a tumor stage III-IV ( p < 0.01). The OHIP-14 correlated significantly with the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 scales. Conclusions As a unidimensional instrument, the OHIP-14 provides oral QoL assessments with sound internal consistency reliability and construct validity among patients with head and neck cancer. Key words: Quality of life, oral health, psychometrics, reliability, validity.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the oral health impact profile - 14 in patients with head and neck cancer

Tesic

Čanković²,

Jevtić³

et al. 2020

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Desdentados totais apresentam taxa muito alta de reabsorção óssea maxilomandibular, no primeiro ano pós as extrações e essa reabsorção pode chegar a 12 mm, em um ano e tende a estabilizar em 1 a 2mm/ano, até chegar à reabsorção completa do rebordo alveolar. Esse processo contínuo de reabsorção óssea, durante os anos, torna a área chapeável muito fina e pequena, chegando a, em determinado momento, no local em que as próteses mucossuportadas simplesmente não têm onde se encaixarem e perdem totalmente ou grande parte da retenção, criando dificuldades para o usuário se alimentar, falar ou exprimir qualquer gesto facial sem que haja o deslocamento da prótese [50].Essa reabsorção óssea contínua pode ser o motivo da relação que mostra quanto maior tempo de uso das próteses mucossuportadas menor é a satisfação e qualidade de vida.…”

Section: Classificaçãounclassified

Relação Entre Tempo De Uso E Qualidade De Vida Em Usuários De Prótese Total No Estado Do Amapá

Cárdenas

Paraguassu

2019

BJIHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: É crescente o número de pessoas sem nenhum dente no Brasil, 11% da população é desdentada total, o que corresponde a um montante de 16 milhões de pessoas e 33% da população faz uso de algum tipo de prótese dentária. O número de dentes presentes na cavidade bucal é pequeno, fazendo com que problemas sociais, físicos, psicológicos e nutricionais afetem diretamente a qualidade de vida dos edêntulos. Objetive: O objetivo deste artigo é relacionar o tempo de uso de próteses totais com a qualidade de vida destes usuários. Methodology: Foram entrevistados 299 usuários de prótese total mucossuportada e 48 usuários de prótese total implantossuportada por meio de dois questionários, o Oral Health Impact Profile-14Br (OHIP-14Br) e questionário sociodemográfico. Results: Ususarios de prótese total possuem melhor qualidade de vida em todas as variáveis comparadas com ussuarios de prótese mucossuportada e usuários de prótese total mucossuportada apresentam grande relação entre qualidade de vida e tempo de uso das próteses.

show abstract

“…In order to determine the scientific validity of a questionnaire, its content validity must be evaluated [21]. In order to assess the reliability of a questionnaire, its internal consistency should be determined by calculating the Cronbach's alpha [22]. The Persian version of the OHIP-14 has been previously validated in Iran for use on the Iranian population [23][24][25].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral Health Related Quality of Life of Patients Using Conventional Dentures versus Implant-Supported Overdentures

Azar

Semyari

Kharazifard

2020

fid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients using conventional dentures versus implant-supported overdentures. Materials and Methods: This study evaluated the OHRQoL of 90 patients between 35 to 75 years who were selected from several public and private dental clinics in Tehran in 2018. Of all, 45 had conventional dentures of both jaws, and 45 had a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants at the site of mandibular canine teeth and a conventional maxillary denture. The OHRQoL of patients was determined using the Oral Health Impact Prfile-20 (OHIP-20). The questionnaire was translated to Persian, and its content validity and internal consistency were confirmed. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney test, and independent t-test. Results: In the conventional denture group, 46.7% had good, 46.7% had moderate, and 6.6% had poor OHRQoL. These values were 55.6%, 37.8% and 6.6% in the overdenture group, respectively. Level of education had a significant correlation with the total score of OHIP-20 in both groups (P<0.05). But no significant association was noted between the residential status and gender of patients with different domains of OHRQoL (P>0.05) except for the psychological disability domain, which had a higher mean value in males with conventional dentures (P<0.05). Conclusion: Patients with a mandibular overdenture supported by two implants at the site of canine teeth and a conventional maxillary denture had higher OHRQoL than patients with conventional dentures of both jaws.

show abstract

Validation of a Portuguese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile adapted to people with mild intellectual disabilities (OHIP-14-MID-PT)

Cited by 7 publications

References 36 publications

Validation of the oral health impact profile - 14 in patients with head and neck cancer

Validation of the oral health impact profile - 14 in patients with head and neck cancer

Relação Entre Tempo De Uso E Qualidade De Vida Em Usuários De Prótese Total No Estado Do Amapá

Oral Health Related Quality of Life of Patients Using Conventional Dentures versus Implant-Supported Overdentures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About