2013
DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720130022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a physical anthropology methodology using mandibles for gender estimation in a Brazilian population

Abstract: Oliveira, et al. (1995), previously used in a population sample from Northeast Brazil. Material and Methods: The accuracy of this method was assessed for a population from Southeast Brazil and validated by statistical tests. The method used two mandibular measurements, namely the bigonial distance and the mandibular ramus height. The sample was composed of 66 skulls and the method was applied by two examiners. The results were statistically analyzed by the paired t test, logistic discriminant analysis and logi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
25
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…High accuracy of 95.1 % was reported in another study in a Brazilian population (Gamba et al), using MRH, BC, BG and gonial angle. Values slightly lower than ours were reported by Carvalho et al (2013), who found 78.13 % for females and 76.47 % for males in an analysis of Brazilian mandibles using BG and MRH.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…High accuracy of 95.1 % was reported in another study in a Brazilian population (Gamba et al), using MRH, BC, BG and gonial angle. Values slightly lower than ours were reported by Carvalho et al (2013), who found 78.13 % for females and 76.47 % for males in an analysis of Brazilian mandibles using BG and MRH.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, sex determination is an integral and fundamental step in biological profile construction from skeletal remains (Lin et al 2014;Lopez-Capp et al 2017). Although sex can be determined by forensic anthropologists with an accuracy of 90-100% when the entire skeleton is available (Byers 2016), in cases where the skeleton is incomplete or fragmented, sex determination can be more difficult (Passalacqua et al 2013). Hence, the need of reliable sex discriminatory methods based on individual parts of the skeleton is evident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various sex discriminating morphological and morphometric traits of the mandible have been described in the literature, such as the "mandibular ramus flexure" or the "ramus length," respectively (Hu et al 2006;Dong et al 2015;Sharma et al 2016). However, morphometric analyses, as opposed to qualitative sex discriminant methods, are more commonly used due to its inherent objectivity, accuracy, reproducibility, and lower level of inter-and intra-observer errors (Saini et al 2011;Carvalho et al 2013;Sharma et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45678910111213141516171819] And synopsis of skeletal parameters of morphometric studies on dry mandible in sex dimorphism was presented in Table 2. [12202122232425262728293031323334353637]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%