2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a menopause quality of life scale: The MENCAV scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of these menopausal quality of life measuring instruments are of different content and they measure different aspects of life during menopause ( 56 ) . Although finding the ideal measuring tool for assessing quality of life is a topic still being explored, existing and accepted instruments in the literature related to menopause and their characteristics are given in Table 2a , 2b , 2c , 2d ( 56 , 57 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ) .…”
Section: A Determination Of Quality Of Life Of Women In Menopausal Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these menopausal quality of life measuring instruments are of different content and they measure different aspects of life during menopause ( 56 ) . Although finding the ideal measuring tool for assessing quality of life is a topic still being explored, existing and accepted instruments in the literature related to menopause and their characteristics are given in Table 2a , 2b , 2c , 2d ( 56 , 57 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ) .…”
Section: A Determination Of Quality Of Life Of Women In Menopausal Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known-groups validity showed that only two instruments could differentiate among different menopausal status. In this review, however, change patterns of QoL levels across menopausal status have been reported inconsistently; the MENCAV scores of nonmenopausal women were higher than those of menopausal women (Buendia Bermejo et al, 2008) whereas MQOL scores followed a U-shaped pattern across the menopausal status with the lowest scores achieved in the middle of menopause (Jacobs et al, 2000). In addition, one of the previous studies reported that there was no significant difference in QoL scores comparing the pre- and perimenopausal women after adjusting for other variables (e.g., age, education level, body mass index, chronic illness; Cheng, Lee, Wang, Wang, & Fuh, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Seven measures were identified in the 16 papers: Women’s Health Questionnaire (WHQ; Genazzani et al, 2002; Hunter, 1992; Progetto Donna Qualita della Vita Working Group et al, 2002; Wiklund et al, 1992; Wool et al, 2000), Menopause Rating Scale (MRS; Dinger et al, 2006; Heinemann et al, 2004; Schneider, Heinemann, Rosemeier, Potthoff, & Behre, 2000a, 2000b; Schneider, Rosemeier, Schnitker, Gerbsch, & Turck, 2000), Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL; Chen, Lin, Wei, Gao, & Wu, 2007; Hilditch et al, 1996), Menopausal Quality of Life (MQOL; Jacobs et al, 2000), the MENCAV (Buendia Bermejo et al, 2008), Utian Quality of Life Scale (UQOL; Utian et al, 2002), and MENQOL-Intervention (Lewis, Hilditch, & Wong, 2005). Among them, MENQOL-Intervention is a modified version of the MENQOL to ensure that side effects of specific therapies that might adversely affect QoL were reflected in the outcome measure (Lewis et al, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations