Comprehensive Flood Risk Management 2012
DOI: 10.1201/b13715-69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a computationally efficient 2D inundation model on multiple scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() has developed a coupled 1D/2D model for the Amazon catchment with the fully dynamic river network model coupled to a simple floodplain storage model, where the floodplain is represented by discrete storage compartments. More complex handling of floodplain inundation was proposed by applying simplified versions of shallow water equations to regular storage cells as well as to irregular storage cells (Jamieson et al ., ). Besides numerous small‐scale applications, regular raster‐based inundation models were applied to the Amazon (Wilson et al ., ), Ob (Biancamaria et al ., ), Pantanal (da Paz et al ., , ) river basins and recently to an 800‐km reach of the Niger using a subgrid channel parameterisation (Neal et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() has developed a coupled 1D/2D model for the Amazon catchment with the fully dynamic river network model coupled to a simple floodplain storage model, where the floodplain is represented by discrete storage compartments. More complex handling of floodplain inundation was proposed by applying simplified versions of shallow water equations to regular storage cells as well as to irregular storage cells (Jamieson et al ., ). Besides numerous small‐scale applications, regular raster‐based inundation models were applied to the Amazon (Wilson et al ., ), Ob (Biancamaria et al ., ), Pantanal (da Paz et al ., , ) river basins and recently to an 800‐km reach of the Niger using a subgrid channel parameterisation (Neal et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more traditional models use topography that has been discretised with ,10 000 elements (approximately 20 m resolution); RFSM EDA is able to discretise the model domain with 16 elements, while retaining the full 2 m resolution DTM that is available for the flux computations at the cell interfaces. The significant reduction in the number of computational elements used by RFSM EDA when compared with models using a more traditional mesh can offer substantial improvements in run-time (Jamieson et al, 2012b). Figure 3 shows a velocity comparison with the Infoworks ICM model for test 5 from the same series of tests.…”
Section: Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It results in the production of a relatively coarse mesh for the flow calculations, while retaining the key topographical features (crests (communication points) and depressions (accumulation points), see Figure 1) defined in the input DTM ( Figure 1). A detailed description of the model is provided in Jamieson et al (2012aJamieson et al ( , 2012b; a summary description is provided below.…”
Section: Model Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models pass standardized point series data through a second file‐based interface called the Q‐Interface (or Flow Interface) to a suite of hydraulic models. These include an OpenMI (OGC OpenMI 2.0, ) composition incorporating MASCARET (Goutal and Maurel, ; Goutal et al ., ) and RFSM‐EDA (Jamieson et al ., , b) and also Delft3D (Roelvink and Van Banning, ). The numerical models within each of the three domains are interoperable in the sense that they all can be interchanged and each set is extensible, readily admitting new models that perform the same (or similar) function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%