2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Commercially Available Screening Tool for the Rapid Identification of CGG Trinucleotide Repeat Expansions in FMR1

Abstract: Recently developed PCR-based methods for fragile X syndrome testing are often regarded as screening tools because of a reduced reliance on Southern blot analysis. However, existing PCR methods rely essentially on capillary electrophoresis for the analysis of amplicons. These methods not only require an expensive capillary electrophoresis instrument but also involve post-PCR processing steps. Here, we evaluated a commercially available PCR-based assay that uses melt curve analysis as a screening tool for the ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genomic DNA isolated from buccal swabs were used for preliminary screening, and all identified “expansion positives” were correctly verified by confirmatory molecular diagnostic tests. Lyons et al [153] and Lim et al [155] have validated the performance of this screening tool, and reported specificities of 95.1% (95% CI, 87.8% to 98.6%) and 99.6% (95% CI, 98.5% to 99.9%), respectively, while both studies recorded a sensitivity of 100% in detecting expansions. In a high NL DNA background, the assay was able to spot mosaicism for PM and FM down to 7.5% and 20%, respectively [155].…”
Section: Fmr1 Molecular Tests For Large-scale Screening Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic DNA isolated from buccal swabs were used for preliminary screening, and all identified “expansion positives” were correctly verified by confirmatory molecular diagnostic tests. Lyons et al [153] and Lim et al [155] have validated the performance of this screening tool, and reported specificities of 95.1% (95% CI, 87.8% to 98.6%) and 99.6% (95% CI, 98.5% to 99.9%), respectively, while both studies recorded a sensitivity of 100% in detecting expansions. In a high NL DNA background, the assay was able to spot mosaicism for PM and FM down to 7.5% and 20%, respectively [155].…”
Section: Fmr1 Molecular Tests For Large-scale Screening Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5-54) become higher CGG repeat (56-4000) and hypomethylation from normal (26-34) degraded to < 26 (5-25 CGG repeat). 21 Small CGG repeat should support LGBT law/psycho-social/MGMT has not previously been reported. Controversial are broad, LGBT problem are huge, increasing but attorney denies that gay people exist in their region (Times magazine, June 12, 2017, page 7)…”
Section: Cgg Repeat In Plant In Association With Dnmt Off In Cgg Repeatmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Coupled to either a methylation specific (MCA; (74)) or a multiplex methylation specific real time PCR (MM-RTPCR) (69), it can differentiate between different PCR amplicons as they melt at specific temperatures and it allows the quantification of the methylation status. In a more recent study, Lim GX, et al (75) validated this approach as screening tool for the identification of expanded FMR1 alleles, showing high analytic specificity and sensitivity. Since there is no need to analyze the amplified products by gel electrophoresis, this approach has the advantage of reducing the risk of contamination and may be more cost effective of those methodologies that require more post-PCR analysis and more expensive equipments/reagents such as capillary electrophoresis.…”
Section: Methylation Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the TP-PCR with MCA approach has the limitation of being very laborious, not being able to distinguish between premutation and full mutation alleles and proven to be not as sensitive for the detection of full mutation females. Lastly and very importantly it does not provide CGG repeat size and FMR1 methylation status (75). However, it may represent a valid screening tool to use in a large population screening studies where the initial step flags for the presence of an expanded allele (>55 CGG repeats).…”
Section: Methylation Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation