2020
DOI: 10.1177/1073191120976851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Brief Measure of Aggression for Ecological Momentary Assessment Research: The Aggression-ES-A

Abstract: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) holds significant potential within aggression research. It affords researchers the possibility of collecting data in ecological context, in near real time. However, there is a lack of measures of aggression that have been developed and validated for use in EMA contexts. In this study, we report on the validation of a measure specifically designed to address this need: the Aggression-ES-A. Building on a previous pilot study, we evaluate the within- and between-person reliab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Aggression-ES Scale was developed to assess participants’ immediate aggressive behaviour, rather than their trait aggressiveness, by experience sampling methodologies (Borah, Murray, Eisner, & Jugl, 2018 ). Omega reliability for the Aggression-ES Scale was reported to be 0.66 at the within-person level and 0.85 at the between-person level (Murray, Eisner, Ribeaud, & Booth, 2020 ). The Aggression-ES Scale was translated into Turkish and modified in accordance with the purpose of the present study, in which the participants were asked about the frequency of aggressive behaviours in the past 2 weeks using a five-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Aggression-ES Scale was developed to assess participants’ immediate aggressive behaviour, rather than their trait aggressiveness, by experience sampling methodologies (Borah, Murray, Eisner, & Jugl, 2018 ). Omega reliability for the Aggression-ES Scale was reported to be 0.66 at the within-person level and 0.85 at the between-person level (Murray, Eisner, Ribeaud, & Booth, 2020 ). The Aggression-ES Scale was translated into Turkish and modified in accordance with the purpose of the present study, in which the participants were asked about the frequency of aggressive behaviours in the past 2 weeks using a five-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For another collaborative study, led by Aja Murray (University of Edinburgh), n = 255 z-proso participants took part in an ecological momentary assessment following the age 20 assessment. Participants were prompted four times per day over two weeks to report on sensations such as momentary aggression, provocation, and affective state (Murray et al, 2020d(Murray et al, , 2021b.…”
Section: What Has Been Measured?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one study established that the SBQ as administered in the current sample has a wide “reliable range of measurement” meaning that it yields reliable scores for a wide range of trait levels (Murray, Eisner, & Ribeaud, 2017), while another suggested that it yielded measurement invariant scores up to the metric level longitudinally over adolescence (Murray, Obsuth, et al, 2017). The factorial validity of the SBQ has also been investigated and supported (Murray, Eisner, & Obsuth, et al, 2017), and its criterion validity can be inferred from evidence across numerous studies that show that its aggression items correlate well with other relevant measures such as aggressive behavior measured using an ecological momentary assessment study design, self-control, moral neutralization, and violent ideations (Murray, Eisner & Ribeaud, 2018; Murray et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%