2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10506-008-9064-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a bayesian belief network representation for posterior probability calculations on national crime victimization survey

Abstract: This paper presents an effort to induce a Bayesian belief network (BBN) from crime data, namely the national crime victimization survey (NCVS). This BBN defines a joint probability distribution over a set of variables that were employed to record a set of crime incidents, with particular focus on characteristics of the victim. The goals are to generate a BBN to capture how characteristics of crime incidents are related to one another, and to make this information available to domain specialists. The novelty as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have been used in many applications including health, ecology and forensic science to better understand and model complex issues (Kuikka, Varis 1997;Taroni et al 2004;Kjaerulff, Madsen 2012;Riesen, Serpen 2008;Johnson et al 2010). A BN represent variables as nodes and arcs as the direct dependencies between variables (Pearl 1986).…”
Section: Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used in many applications including health, ecology and forensic science to better understand and model complex issues (Kuikka, Varis 1997;Taroni et al 2004;Kjaerulff, Madsen 2012;Riesen, Serpen 2008;Johnson et al 2010). A BN represent variables as nodes and arcs as the direct dependencies between variables (Pearl 1986).…”
Section: Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed modeling approach is also a contribution to the literature on Bayesian network modeling in law because it is one of very few addressing civil litigation. Almost all Bayesian network papers in law have focused on criminal law, with special emphasis on assessing evidence [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. A major methodological difference is that much of the modeling in criminal cases is focused on computing likelihood ratios for competing theories of a legal case [53], while the method proposed here focuses on computing the probability of failing to meet a generally accepted standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our modelling approach used BBNS to capture the mechanistic understanding of the system elicited from experts. While BBNs are increasingly being used in predictive modelling, only a few are validated (Marcot et al, 2006;Riesen & Serpen, 2008;Stojadinovic et al, 2010) and rarely using independent data (Smith et al, in press;Howes & Maron, 2008). Uncertainty in model structure is also rarely explored in BBNs (Kuhnert & Hayes, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%