2017
DOI: 10.1061/jtepbs.0000052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and Sensitivity Analysis of a Developed Midblock Vehicular Delay Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A model for estimating platoon delay because of pedestrian crossing was validated for use in Kuwait City. The model performed by Forde and Maina (2017) was modified slightly for the scenario found in Kuwait, in which the presence of raised crosswalks meant that all incoming traffic would slow down automatically. Using video footage to observe the site, several variables were collected, and a model was used to calculate the delays suffered by the vehicles because of pedestrian crossing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A model for estimating platoon delay because of pedestrian crossing was validated for use in Kuwait City. The model performed by Forde and Maina (2017) was modified slightly for the scenario found in Kuwait, in which the presence of raised crosswalks meant that all incoming traffic would slow down automatically. Using video footage to observe the site, several variables were collected, and a model was used to calculate the delays suffered by the vehicles because of pedestrian crossing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second method was based on modifying the model found by Forde and Maina (2017) which estimates the delay incurred by platoon vehicles because of pedestrian activity at crosswalks. The modification was performed in a way to suit the scenario found in Kuwait City.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The quantitative validation involves performing t-test using Microsoft Excel by comparing the actual output data and the simulation results (status quo) (Forde and Maina 2017). The actual data output is obtained from the LSP and the Farmer Group Packing house.…”
Section: Model Verification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%