2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and reliability of two activity monitors for energy expenditure assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further development of objective, field capable measurement devices are needed to more accurately ascertain exposure to occupational and leisure-time PA and understand their relationship with health outcomes (Holtermann, 2015). Several recent studies and systematic reviews have assessed the validity and/or reliability of PA monitors among participants in controlled laboratory environments and/or during free-living conditions (AguilarFarías et al, 2014;Brazeau et al, 2014;Grydeland et al, 2014;Jarrett et al, 2014;John et al, 2010John et al, , 2013Kelly et al, 2013;Kowalski et al, 2012;Van Remoortel et al, 2012;Thiese, 2014;Vanhelst et al, 2010;Welk et al, 2012;Yang and Hsu, 2010). Results have generally suggested a high level of heterogeneity (Van Remoortel et al, 2012), indicating a need for researchers to cautiously select monitors and summary metrics that are appropriate for their research questions (Kowalski et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further development of objective, field capable measurement devices are needed to more accurately ascertain exposure to occupational and leisure-time PA and understand their relationship with health outcomes (Holtermann, 2015). Several recent studies and systematic reviews have assessed the validity and/or reliability of PA monitors among participants in controlled laboratory environments and/or during free-living conditions (AguilarFarías et al, 2014;Brazeau et al, 2014;Grydeland et al, 2014;Jarrett et al, 2014;John et al, 2010John et al, , 2013Kelly et al, 2013;Kowalski et al, 2012;Van Remoortel et al, 2012;Thiese, 2014;Vanhelst et al, 2010;Welk et al, 2012;Yang and Hsu, 2010). Results have generally suggested a high level of heterogeneity (Van Remoortel et al, 2012), indicating a need for researchers to cautiously select monitors and summary metrics that are appropriate for their research questions (Kowalski et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This validated SenseWear System® (Brazeau et al, 2016) recorded continuous physiological activity data using heat flux, galvanic skin response, skin temperature, and a three-axis accelerometer that was recorded at one-minute intervals. Daily times spent in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous activity were used for this analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of steps and the METS were used to estimate participants level of physical activity using a validated triaxial accelerometer (SenseWear ® Mini Armband) as previously described by Brazeau et al [68],Colbert et al [69]. Participants had to wear the device in the left arm all the time during 7 consecutive days, except when taking a shower or swimming.…”
Section: Energy Balancementioning
confidence: 99%