2015
DOI: 10.1177/0957650915587144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation and flow structure analysis in a turbofan stage at windmill

Abstract: In the present study, the flow through the fan stage of a high bypass ratio turbofan at windmill is studied numerically. First, steady mixing plane simulations are validated against detailed experimental engine test-bed measurements, at several locations within the fan stage and close to the core/bypass flow splitter. Good agreement between the numerical and experimental results is obtained. A local flow analysis is proposed, evidencing several characteristics of the flow in windmilling: in the rotor, the size… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Profiles are non-dimensionalized with the engine inlet Mach number M 2A , measured at mid-span (h/h max = 0.5), in order to observe the inlet conditions dependency. Results are consistent with previous work (García Dufour et al, 2015). At engine inlet (Figure 3 (a)), the Mach number is uniform across the first 75% of the span, then decreases near the shroud.…”
Section: Steady Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Profiles are non-dimensionalized with the engine inlet Mach number M 2A , measured at mid-span (h/h max = 0.5), in order to observe the inlet conditions dependency. Results are consistent with previous work (García Dufour et al, 2015). At engine inlet (Figure 3 (a)), the Mach number is uniform across the first 75% of the span, then decreases near the shroud.…”
Section: Steady Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Remarkably, a local minimum of incidence is observed around h/h max = 0.65, which matches the maximum of velocity deficit in the stator wake as described in Figure 3 (c). This explains the larger size of the stator separation around 60% span observed by Dufour et al (2015). Finally, similarly to the Mach number profiles, a fairly good self-similarity of incidence profiles is observed in the range of inlet flow parameters being tested.…”
Section: Steady Analysissupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations