Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30102-8_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating Word-Oriented Processors for Bit and Multi-word Operations

Abstract: Abstract. We examine secure computing paradigms to identify any new architectural challenges for future general-purpose processors. Some essential security functions can be provided by different classes of cryptography algorithms. We identify two categories of operations in these algorithms that are not common in previous general-purpose workloads: bit operations within a word and multi-word operations. Both challenge the basic word orientation of processors. We show how very complex bit-level operations, name… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). The same scenario is articulated by Lee et al [LYS04], who describe and use the term Multi-word Operand, Multi-word Result (MOMR) to characterise and thereby distinguish cryptographic operations from the general case. There are various ways to satisfy this requirement: we use an implied approach, where two indexes are encoded as one, i.e., (i, i + 1) → i.…”
Section: A Design Perspectivementioning
confidence: 86%
“…4). The same scenario is articulated by Lee et al [LYS04], who describe and use the term Multi-word Operand, Multi-word Result (MOMR) to characterise and thereby distinguish cryptographic operations from the general case. There are various ways to satisfy this requirement: we use an implied approach, where two indexes are encoded as one, i.e., (i, i + 1) → i.…”
Section: A Design Perspectivementioning
confidence: 86%