2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-006-9002-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal

Abstract: This study validated the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) on a sample of 273 private university students in Lebanon. For that purpose, evidence for construct validation was investigated through identifying the test's factor structure and subscale total correlations, in addition to differences in scores by gender, different levels, and streams using a series of ANOVA tests. Evidence for the test's reliability and concurrent validity was also collected. Moreover, students in five courses that em… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
31
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Watson & Glaser (2008) designed a thinking model that combines attitudes, knowledge, and skills to develop critical thinking skills [5], [6]. The Attitudes regarding efforts is to identify the problems and seek supporting evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watson & Glaser (2008) designed a thinking model that combines attitudes, knowledge, and skills to develop critical thinking skills [5], [6]. The Attitudes regarding efforts is to identify the problems and seek supporting evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La WGcTa UK , aunque desarrollada originalmente en la década de 1920, es aún una de las herramientas más utilizadas a nivel mundial para medir razonamiento crítico en educación 11 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The assessment tool used was comprised of a critical thinking test, an adaptation of the Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal (see Watson 1980;Wilson, Wagner, 1981;Hassan, Madhum, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%