“…In some of those studies they score as less authoritarian than various civilian groups (including college stu-dents and teachers, as well as, more appropriately, lower middle class or working class men). Conversely, the use of a variety of other clinical and psychiatric techniques has shown policemen to be rather impulsive risk takers, prone to act out their impulses in physical aggression (Danish & Brodsky, 1970;Rhead et al, 1968) or to project their aggressiveness onto others as self-justifications (Mills, 1969); markedly self-assertive and concerned with maintaining a virile self-image while at the same time somewhat lacking in self-confidence and preferring to be supervised-as well as preferring to supervise others-in a highly directive manner (Leiren, 1973;Matarazzo et al, 1964;Trojanowicz, 1971;Walther, McCune, &Trojanowicz, 1973); and more rigid, far more punitive, and more easily influenced by a status figure than comparison groups (Carlson et al, 197 1 ;Marshall & Mansson, 1966). However, although highly assertive, they do not respond with above-average forcefulness to the aggression of others (Trojanowicz, 1971;Walther et al, 1973), and the aggression and impulsivity observed in the above studies were specifically noted by several of the authors to be nonpathological.…”