2014
DOI: 10.1080/10627197.2014.903654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating the Conceptions of Assessment-III Scale in Canadian Preservice Teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale subsequently developed therefore has strong theoretical support, with the SECS including specific features identified by Robinson et al (1991), Dees (1998), Alvord et al (2004), De Pablo et al (2004, Weerawardena and Sullivan Mort (2006), Ali et al (2009), Lee and Lai (2010), S anchez (2010), Othman et al (2012), Ram and Selvaraj (2012) and Ghazali et al (2013). In addition, the processes of development and validation of the scale follow that performed for similar works (Piazza and Siebert 2008;Lemos et al 2011;Coetzee 2014;Daniels et al 2014;Cumming et al 2015). Altogether, this strengthens the value of the SECS, ensuring a wide range of possible application for the instrument.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scale subsequently developed therefore has strong theoretical support, with the SECS including specific features identified by Robinson et al (1991), Dees (1998), Alvord et al (2004), De Pablo et al (2004, Weerawardena and Sullivan Mort (2006), Ali et al (2009), Lee and Lai (2010), S anchez (2010), Othman et al (2012), Ram and Selvaraj (2012) and Ghazali et al (2013). In addition, the processes of development and validation of the scale follow that performed for similar works (Piazza and Siebert 2008;Lemos et al 2011;Coetzee 2014;Daniels et al 2014;Cumming et al 2015). Altogether, this strengthens the value of the SECS, ensuring a wide range of possible application for the instrument.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Following the approaches of previous studies (Piazza and Siebert 2008;Lemos et al 2011;Coetzee 2014;Daniels et al 2014;Cumming et al 2015), several steps were taken: literature review (previously showed), initial scale proposal, expert judgement (logical review), pilot test (empirical review), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). All statistical tests and the EFA were conducted using the SPSS software (version 24.0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent research examining how pre-service teachers conceptualize the purpose of classroom assessment supports that teachers in Canada are increasingly adopting the stance that assessment improves learning. Research investigating pre-service teachers' conceptions of assessment purposes found that pre-service teachers in the province of Alberta more highly endorsed positive conceptions of assessment, such as "assessment improves learning" and "assessment improves teaching" compared to negative conceptions (e.g., assessment is ignored, assessment is bad; Daniels et al, 2014). Despite high support for positive conceptions, this study also found that participants expressed higher endorsement for one negative conception-assessment is inaccurate-compared to other countries.…”
Section: Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broader policy environment and accountability systems also influence teachers' data use (Datnow & Hubbard, 2015;Hoogland et al, 2016). For example, in Alberta, Canada teachers are involved in creating and scoring assessments (Daniels, Poth, Papile, & Hutchison, 2014) which is not true of countries like the United States. Issues and policies like these can drive teachers' AL and DLFT work.…”
Section: Inservice Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%