2011
DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v27i6.6465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating Measures Of Self Control Via Rasch Measurement

Abstract: Self control has been offered as a fundamental explanation for consumption behavior in a number of marketing settings. Until recently, measurement of self control had been inadequate, with advances being made only in specific domains. Tangney, Baumeister, and Boone (2004) introduced a reflective measure of self control which has gained popularity across social science research. However, the authors did not subject this critical measure to a review of fit and function through a psychometric lens. This study rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study examining the measurement properties of the scale in more detail, it was found that it offered an adequate measure of its latent concept but that it might not measure very high or low levels of self-control precisely (Hasford and Bradley, 2011). The authors found moderate correlations between these scales and scales measuring social desirability tendencies (ranging between 0.50 and 0.60).…”
Section: Measurement Of Self-controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study examining the measurement properties of the scale in more detail, it was found that it offered an adequate measure of its latent concept but that it might not measure very high or low levels of self-control precisely (Hasford and Bradley, 2011). The authors found moderate correlations between these scales and scales measuring social desirability tendencies (ranging between 0.50 and 0.60).…”
Section: Measurement Of Self-controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Tangney et al 2004). Research testing the empirical validity of the scale have found it be valid, reliable and consistent (Hasford & Bradley, 2011). The study comprehensively rejected the Null hypothesis which proposed that a positive correlation between self control and well being would not be established.…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Por lo que refiere al ajuste global de los ítems, este fue adecuado para 35 de los 36 ítems que componen la escala. Si bien existe un único ítem que no se ajusta a lo que el modelo podría predecir, cabe mencionar que en la literatura no se encuentran motivos teóricos que expliquen tal comportamiento (Hasford & Bradley, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Por ende, no se observó la presencia de reactivos en el extremo superior e inferior del continuo. Esta distribución de los ítems indicaría que la SCS no permitiría valorar niveles muy altos o muy bajos de autocontrol, lo cual coincide con otros estudios que han reportados resultados similares (Hasford & Bradley, 2011). Considerar esto resulta de interés, ya que diversos estudios que utilizan la SCS llegan a conclusiones que implican afirmaciones respecto a altos niveles o bajos niveles de autocontrol.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation