2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2020.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating measurements of acclimation for climate change adaptation

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical limits are a widely used metric for assessing the vulnerability of organisms to climate change. Yet, methodology strongly affects outcomes; for example, fast ramping rates or high start temperatures can result in higher CT max estimates [47]. Our study highlights the importance of flow in influencing thermal limits and suggests that higher flows may raise estimated values of CT max .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Critical limits are a widely used metric for assessing the vulnerability of organisms to climate change. Yet, methodology strongly affects outcomes; for example, fast ramping rates or high start temperatures can result in higher CT max estimates [47]. Our study highlights the importance of flow in influencing thermal limits and suggests that higher flows may raise estimated values of CT max .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Acclimation and other kinds of physiological plasticity are likely to play an important role in reducing the short-and long-term effects, thereby increasing species resilience towards urbanisation. Despite the high interest in plasticity, studies of urban physiology (like most urban ecology studies) mainly use effect size analyses and summary statistics between urban and non-urban sites, which obscure the potential to explore the underlying variance across different contexts (see Terblanche and Hoffmann, 2020). Cross-fostering, common garden and translocation studies would also be useful for understanding both the capacities for plasticity across naïve and pre-exposed individuals and populations, and the underlying mechanism(s) behind the variation (i.e.…”
Section: Physiological Plasticity: Chronic and Acute Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of 0.25 • C/min, a rate that is thought to be more ecologically relevant than a higher rate although still faster than diurnal rates of air temperature change (Chown et al, 2009;Nyamukondiwa and Terblanche, 2010), with frequent checking for the onset of spasms and the loss of righting response (no response to stimuli), using the latter for the comparative analysis. The start temperature was set at 22.5 • C for 10 mins (intermediate between the two acclimation temperatures of 20 • C and 26 • C) so that the ramping rate was exactly the same between individuals acclimated at different temperatures and avoiding the confounding effect of starting from a different baseline condition that might artificially elevate measures of the plastic response (Terblanche and Hoffmann, 2020). Typically we used 9-10 individuals per acclimation temperature and critical thermal measured (or more when possible), even though for one population of C. hottentotus we could only obtain 5-6 individuals for each measurement (Table 2).…”
Section: Thermal Baths and Critical Thermal Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is well established that the thermal limit assay endpoints (e.g. choice of behavioural metric, like heat coma or muscle spasms), and variation in assay methods such as ramping rate and start conditions, can readily influence tolerance estimates and the magnitude of plasticity (reviewed recently in Terblanche and Hoffmann, 2020).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%