2021
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating dynamicity in resting state fMRI with activation‐informed temporal segmentation

Abstract: Confirming the presence (or absence) of dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) states during rest is an important open question in the field of cognitive neuroscience. The prevailing dFC framework aims to identify dynamics directly from connectivity estimates with a sliding window approach, however this method suffers from several drawbacks including sensitivity to window size and poor test-retest reliability. We hypothesize that time-varying changes in functional connectivity are mirrored by significant tempor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent methodological breakthroughs, in which individual‐level parcellation has been mapped using iterative clustering analysis on group‐level parcellations (M. L. Li et al, 2019 ; D. H. Wang et al, 2015 ), offer the opportunity to characterize dynamic functional network organization changes with age at the individual level. In addition, researchers have noticed the drawback and limitation of fixed‐length sliding window analysis and proposed data‐driven segmentation of sliding windows (Choe et al, 2017 ), such as the hidden Markov model (G. M. Zhang et al, 2020 ), the dynamic conditional correlation model (Lindquist et al, 2014 ), and activation‐informed temporal segmentation (Duda et al, 2021 ). Considering differences in interindividual parcellation, internetwork organization and interindividual sliding window activities with increasing age, we used individual participant parcellation and individual network dynamic analysis on individual sliding window lengths to advance the understanding of dynamic network organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent methodological breakthroughs, in which individual‐level parcellation has been mapped using iterative clustering analysis on group‐level parcellations (M. L. Li et al, 2019 ; D. H. Wang et al, 2015 ), offer the opportunity to characterize dynamic functional network organization changes with age at the individual level. In addition, researchers have noticed the drawback and limitation of fixed‐length sliding window analysis and proposed data‐driven segmentation of sliding windows (Choe et al, 2017 ), such as the hidden Markov model (G. M. Zhang et al, 2020 ), the dynamic conditional correlation model (Lindquist et al, 2014 ), and activation‐informed temporal segmentation (Duda et al, 2021 ). Considering differences in interindividual parcellation, internetwork organization and interindividual sliding window activities with increasing age, we used individual participant parcellation and individual network dynamic analysis on individual sliding window lengths to advance the understanding of dynamic network organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 而 传统 fMRI 研究或是未采用此方法对头动噪声进 行进一步的控制, 或是虽然运用了此方法但采用 了更加宽松的阈值(一般为删除 FD > 0.5 mm 的图像) (Duda et al, 2021;Fan et al, 2021;Power et al, 2012;Sripada et al, 2020;Tarchi et al, 2022) (Bergmann et al, 2020;Dworetsky, Seitzman, Adeyemo, Smith, et al, 2021;Kong et al, 2019;Seitzman et al, 2019;Yang et al, 2022) 的 (Glasser et al, 2013;Miller et al, 2016)…”
unclassified