2016
DOI: 10.1080/07293682.2016.1139605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating and measuring public open space is not a walk in the park

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comprehensive Victorian Planning Authority Metropolitan Open Space Network walkable catchment layer [ 38 ] was used to determine if households were located within 400 m of open space in Melbourne with open space access points within this dataset specified by the provider at 30-m intervals. For Adelaide, data were sourced from a previous study [ 46 ] and 400-m pedestrian network service areas were created along park border points (50-m spacing). In both cities, the selected open space features outlined in Table 2 were rasterised to a 10-m × 10-m grid (cell defined as open space: 0 = no; 1 = yes).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comprehensive Victorian Planning Authority Metropolitan Open Space Network walkable catchment layer [ 38 ] was used to determine if households were located within 400 m of open space in Melbourne with open space access points within this dataset specified by the provider at 30-m intervals. For Adelaide, data were sourced from a previous study [ 46 ] and 400-m pedestrian network service areas were created along park border points (50-m spacing). In both cities, the selected open space features outlined in Table 2 were rasterised to a 10-m × 10-m grid (cell defined as open space: 0 = no; 1 = yes).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The walkability index was constructed as the sum of deciles for dwelling density, road network density, and land use mix [51]. Availability of active public open space was defined as the count of active public open spaces (# parks) [52]. The retail food environment index, indicating the relative 'unhealthfulness' of the food environment, was expressed as the ratio of unhealthful food stores to healthful food stores, where unhealthful stores included major fastfood franchises and independent fast-food take-away stores, bakeries, sweet food retailers and convenience stores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study in Adelaide, South Australia, compared three public open space datasets and checked these against a planning standard for public open space supply (Daker et al ., ). That research highlighted important differences in the estimation of public open space across the study region and demonstrated that the choice of data source has the potential to inadvertently impact on findings and lead to incorrect policy recommendations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Comparison of 2011 Mesh Block representation of parkland compared with 2011 Spatial Epidemiology and Evaluation Research Group (Daker et al ., ), representation of public open space/parkland. ABS, Australian Bureau of Statistics; POS, public open space…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%