2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rccar.2016.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validación y comparación de los puntajes TIMI y GRACE en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also used in predicting the risk of death in patients who have undergone STEMI. 23,32 The GRACE scale uses the prediction of hospital death after an AMI. The authors Santos Medina M. et al confirm the validity of this scale in their study, which shows that hospital mortality was 51.8% in patients who were at high risk on this scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also used in predicting the risk of death in patients who have undergone STEMI. 23,32 The GRACE scale uses the prediction of hospital death after an AMI. The authors Santos Medina M. et al confirm the validity of this scale in their study, which shows that hospital mortality was 51.8% in patients who were at high risk on this scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scale was developed to predict the prognosis and CVRF associated with patients after ACS, and also assesses the prognosis of death one month and 6 months after discharge from hospital. 3,[22][23][24] Another TIMI (Trombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) scoring system developed with the aim of predicting 30-day and one-year mortality after SCACEST. In addition, this scale presents the ability to make a global estimate of the risk presented by this type of patient.…”
Section: Risk Prediction Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%