2016
DOI: 10.1344/reire2016.9.2923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validaci�n de un instrumento en espa�ol para medir habilidades parentales promovidas en una interve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, parent reports address parental abilities or competences in a broad sense, and parents respond to different items in terms of their consciousness about their own most frequent behaviors and attitudes about their child’s rearing and education. Good examples of this kind of instrument are the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (Essau et al, 2006), the Baby Care Questionnaire (Winstanley and Gattis, 2013), and those developed by Gómez and Muñoz (2014) in Chile, and by Vázquez et al (2016) in Spain. Although these tools can be useful for gaining knowledge about parental competences, they have some limitations that are common to all measures based on self-reporting, which include limitations on validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, parent reports address parental abilities or competences in a broad sense, and parents respond to different items in terms of their consciousness about their own most frequent behaviors and attitudes about their child’s rearing and education. Good examples of this kind of instrument are the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (Essau et al, 2006), the Baby Care Questionnaire (Winstanley and Gattis, 2013), and those developed by Gómez and Muñoz (2014) in Chile, and by Vázquez et al (2016) in Spain. Although these tools can be useful for gaining knowledge about parental competences, they have some limitations that are common to all measures based on self-reporting, which include limitations on validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%