2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03112.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valganciclovir: Recent Progress

Abstract: The question of optimal dosing will probably not be settled as the sample size for controlled trials would be prohibitive. Other trials clearly show that extended therapy provides added benefit, the drug is safe and an appropriate dose has been identified in children and oral therapy of CMV disease is effective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extending anti‐CMV prophylaxis to 6 months appears to provide a significant benefit in reducing the incidence of CMV disease and viraemia in high‐risk D + R − SOT patients, compared to 3 month prophylactic regimens[2,6]. While these results are encouraging, the impact of lengthening prophylaxis on the primary CMV immune response in D + R − SOT patients has not been established, and needs to be evaluated in a prospective clinical trial [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extending anti‐CMV prophylaxis to 6 months appears to provide a significant benefit in reducing the incidence of CMV disease and viraemia in high‐risk D + R − SOT patients, compared to 3 month prophylactic regimens[2,6]. While these results are encouraging, the impact of lengthening prophylaxis on the primary CMV immune response in D + R − SOT patients has not been established, and needs to be evaluated in a prospective clinical trial [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universal antiviral prophylaxis with the orally available agent valganciclovir (VALGAN) has proved successful in limiting cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, reducing mortality and graft rejection in high‐risk CMV seronegative recipients (R − ) of a solid organ transplant (SOT) from a seropositive donor (D + )[1,2]. Without antiviral prophylaxis, CMV disease occurs with incidence up to 72% in D + R − patients, during the first 3 months post‐transplant, when patients are receiving intensive immunosuppressive agents for prevention of graft rejection [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only significant side effect reported for prophylaxis with V‐GCV was a reduction in white blood cell count . However, several studies reported a V‐GCV related neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1000 cells/mL) in both SOT and HSCT ranging from 13 to 23% and a severe neutropenia (ANC <500 cells/mL) from 0 to 7% . Neutropenia seems to be significantly higher in patients in treatment with GCV than V‐GCV, and only isolated cases had to discontinue the V‐GCV treatment because of leukopenia adverse effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there is no vaccine for HCMV, antiviral drugs constitute the current treatment for CMV infection; the available antiviral drugs include ganciclovir (GCV), valganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir and fomivirsen (5,6). However, these antiviral therapies have limited efficacy and a high incidence of side-effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%