2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Patients of Reproductive Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data presented in our study are in accordance with previous studies, which showed that the use of misoprostol before outpatient or inpatient hysteroscopy is often accompanied with unwanted adverse effects [20,23]. Valente et al [23] reported adverse effects in the form of vaginal bleeding (55%), nausea (15%), diarrhea (5%), and fever (5%) after vaginal administration of misoprostol 6 h prior to office hysteroscopy.…”
Section: Misoprostol Prior To Office Hysteroscopysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data presented in our study are in accordance with previous studies, which showed that the use of misoprostol before outpatient or inpatient hysteroscopy is often accompanied with unwanted adverse effects [20,23]. Valente et al [23] reported adverse effects in the form of vaginal bleeding (55%), nausea (15%), diarrhea (5%), and fever (5%) after vaginal administration of misoprostol 6 h prior to office hysteroscopy.…”
Section: Misoprostol Prior To Office Hysteroscopysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The study found that vaginal misoprostol was not effective in reducing the pain perceived during office hysteroscopy [23]. On the contrary, Esin et al [24] reported that sublingual misoprostol (200 µg administered 2 h before the procedure) was more effective than lidocaine spray in minimizing the pain perceived by premenopausal women during office hysteroscopy.…”
Section: Misoprostol Prior To Office Hysteroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies were considered eligible for inclusion in the review (Figure 1). 11–16 The inter‐rater reliability for the study selection was very good (κ = 0.86). Four of the six papers were deemed to be of high quality 12,13,15,16 (Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An attempt was made to contact authors for their primary data but unfortunately insufficient data were received to be able to perform any analysis. The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects were reported by two studies, 15,16 bleeding by four studies, 11,14–16 cervical lacerations by three studies 11,13,16 and failed procedures by three studies 12,13,15 . These results were meta‐analysed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation