None.

Objective To evaluate whether vaginoscopy or standard hysteroscopy was more successful in the outpatient setting. Design Randomised controlled multicentre trial. Setting Outpatient hysteroscopy clinics at two UK hospitals. Population 1597 women aged 16 or older undergoing an outpatient hysteroscopy. Methods Women were allocated to vaginoscopy or standard hysteroscopy using third party randomisation stratified by menopausal status with no blinding of participants or clinicians. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was ‘success’, a composite endpoint defined as: a complete procedure, no complications, a level of pain acceptable to the patient, and no sign of genitourinary tract infection 2 weeks after the procedure. Results Vaginoscopy was significantly more successful than standard hysteroscopy [647/726 (89%) versus 621/734 (85%), respectively; relative risk (RR) 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.10; P = 0.01]. The median time taken to complete vaginoscopy was 2 minutes compared with 3 minutes for standard hysteroscopy (P < 0.001). The mean pain score was 42.7 for vaginoscopy, which was significantly less than standard hysteroscopy 46.4 (P = 0.02). Operative complications occurred in five women receiving vaginoscopy and 19 women receiving standard hysteroscopy (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10–0.69). Conclusions Vaginoscopy is quicker to perform, less painful, and more successful than standard hysteroscopy and therefore should be considered the technique of choice for outpatient hysteroscopy. Tweetable abstract Vaginoscopy is quicker to perform, less painful, and more successful than standard hysteroscopy.

No abstract