2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaginal cleansing with chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone-iodine prior to cesarean delivery: a randomized comparator-controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact was observed among the women in the control arm, where the incidence of endometritis (26.7%) and composite post‐CS infectious morbidities (36.8%) were very high as compared with the intervention arm. The benefit of antiseptic cleansing of the vagina in the reduction of post‐cesarean endometritis has been shown by various studies of Aref et al, 31 Starr et al, 32 Ahmed et al, 33 and Lakhi et al 29 Support for this beneficial role was seen in our study, as there was a markedly reduced risk of endometritis in women who received vaginal cleansing (RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.16‐0.53; P < .05). This benefit is much more marked in women that are in labor before abdominal delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This fact was observed among the women in the control arm, where the incidence of endometritis (26.7%) and composite post‐CS infectious morbidities (36.8%) were very high as compared with the intervention arm. The benefit of antiseptic cleansing of the vagina in the reduction of post‐cesarean endometritis has been shown by various studies of Aref et al, 31 Starr et al, 32 Ahmed et al, 33 and Lakhi et al 29 Support for this beneficial role was seen in our study, as there was a markedly reduced risk of endometritis in women who received vaginal cleansing (RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.16‐0.53; P < .05). This benefit is much more marked in women that are in labor before abdominal delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This finding could be attributed to the antiseptic properties of chlorhexidine gluconate solution, 28 which was enhanced by the multiple numbers of times the vagina was cleaned with the solution in our study. Lakhi et al 29 reported the beneficial role of vaginal cleansing with chlorhexidine in reducing postpartum infection, in which the rate of wound infection was significantly lower in the chlorhexidine arm than povidone‐iodine (0.6% vs 2.0%; P = .039). However, our study was not supported by the findings of Rouse et al 18 in the USA, who reported a nonsignificant reduction in endocervical colonization and endometritis among their study population following labor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to thank Drs Migliorelli and Martinez De Tejada for their thoughtful comments. 1 They raise an important issue regarding which patients could benefit most from vaginal cleansing before cesarean delivery (CD). The group of nonemergent CDs in our study included both scheduled CD (eg, breech/transverse presentation, repeat CD declining a trial of labor, multifetal delivery, macrosomia) and those that occurred after a trial of labor (arrest disorders, maternal request while laboring, category II fetal heart tracings, and failed inductions with trial of labor).…”
Section: Replymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TO THE EDITORS: We read with great interest the recent article by Lakhi et al 1 Indeed, abdominal preparation protocols increasingly are using chlorhexidine as a disinfectant because it appears to have a better antibacterial profile, 2 without concerns related to interference on maternal or fetal thyroid affectation. 3 The fact that chlorhexidine decreases wound complications while being equivalent to povidone-iodine in terms of the incidence of other infections may help promote the implementation of vaginal cleansing as part of the presurgical routine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most data regarding vaginal cleansing showed a benefit when the intervention was applied in emergent cesarean deliveries, although it remains uncertain if the same procedure will have an impact on scheduled interventions. 4 We carefully looked at the population in the study by Lakhi et al, 1 but we were unable to clearly define which types of surgery were included. For example, the abstract refers to "nonemergent cesarean deliveries," although the Editor's note mentions "non-scheduled (.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%