We present the scattering approach which is nowadays the best tool for describing the Casimir force in realistic experimental configurations. After reminders on the simple geometries of 1d space and specular scatterers in 3d space, we discuss the case of stationary arbitrarily shaped mirrors in electromagnetic vacuum. We then review specific calculations based on the scattering approach, dealing for example with the forces or torques between nanostructured surfaces and with the force between a plane and a sphere. In these various cases, we account for the material dependence of the forces, and show that the geometry dependence goes beyond the trivial Proximity Force Approximation often used for discussing experiments.
The many facets of the Casimir effectThe Casimir effect [1] is a jewel with many facets. First, it is an observable effect of vacuum fluctuations in the mesoscopic world, which deserves careful attention as a crucial prediction of quantum field theory [2][3][4][5][6][7].Then, it is also a fascinating interface between quantum field theory and other important aspects of fundamental physics. It has connections with the puzzles of gravitational physics through the problem of vacuum energy [8,9] as well as with the principle of relativity of motion through the dynamical Casimir-like effects [10][11][12]. Effects beyond the Proximity Force Approximation also make apparent the extremely rich interplay of vacuum energy with geometry (references and more discussions below).Casimir physics also plays an important role in the tests of gravity at sub-millimeter ranges [13,14] Finally, the Casimir force and closely related Van der Waals force are dominant at micron or sub-micron distances, which entails that they have strong connections with various important domains, such as atomic and molecular physics, condensed matter and surface physics, chemical and biological physics, micro-and nano-technology [20].
Comparison of the Casimir force measurements with theoryIn short-range gravity tests, the new force would appear as a difference between the experimental result F exp and theoretical prediction F th . This implies that F th and F exp have to be assessed independently from each other and should forbid anyone to use theory-experiment comparison for proving (or disproving) some specific experimental result or theoretical model.Casimir calculated the force between a pair of perfectly smooth, flat and parallel plates in the limit of zero temperature and perfect reflection. He found universal expressions for the force F Cas and energy E Caswith L the distance, A the area, c the speed of light and the Planck constant. This universality is explained by the saturation of the optical response of perfect mirrors which reflect 100% (no less, no more) of the incoming fields. Clearly, this idealization does not correspond to any real mirror. In fact, the effect of imperfect reflection is large in most experiments, and a precise knowledge of its frequency dependence is essential for obtaining a reliable theoretical predict...