2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.83.052503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural anisotropy and orientation-induced Casimir repulsion in fluids

Abstract: In this work we theoretically consider the Casimir force between two periodic arrays of nanowires (both in vacuum, and on a substrate separated by a fluid) at separations comparable to the period. Specifically, we compute the dependence of the exact Casimir force between the arrays under both lateral translations and rotations. Although typically the force between such structures is well characterized by the proximity force approximation (PFA), we find that in the present case the microstructure modulates the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique has been used by Rosa et al 44,45 in their analysis of the Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials. If the incident wave is TM wave, the EM fields in the medium can be written with reference to the x 0 y 0 z 0 coordinate system as the following form: 44 E Q -T A R G E T ; t e m p : i n t r a l i n k -; e 0 1 5 ; 1 1 6 ; 3 2 7 H ¼ UðzÞ expðjωt − jβxÞ; where U ¼ ðU x ; U y ; U z Þ;…”
Section: Appendix: the Modified 4 × 4 Transfer Matrix Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been used by Rosa et al 44,45 in their analysis of the Casimir interactions for anisotropic magnetodielectric metamaterials. If the incident wave is TM wave, the EM fields in the medium can be written with reference to the x 0 y 0 z 0 coordinate system as the following form: 44 E Q -T A R G E T ; t e m p : i n t r a l i n k -; e 0 1 5 ; 1 1 6 ; 3 2 7 H ¼ UðzÞ expðjωt − jβxÞ; where U ¼ ðU x ; U y ; U z Þ;…”
Section: Appendix: the Modified 4 × 4 Transfer Matrix Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the EMA has to be justified with great care. Indeed, such an approximation usually requires the separation distance L to be equal or larger than the lattice parameter a 0 of the periodically nanostructured surface [14]. The reason is that the distance is one of the main parameter determining the nature of the electromagnetic modes (radiative or evanescent) involved in the calculation of the Lifshitz-van der Waals interaction.…”
Section: Modelling and Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the assimilation of the surface corrugation to a graded effective refractive index layer is relevant [11][12][13] and allows simplifying greatly the application of nonadditive methods, while still taking fully into account electrodynamical coupling between features as it will be explained below. Motivated by recent theoretical [13][14][15] and experimental [16] studies, we introduce the novel concept of manipulating quantum vacuum photon modes at the sub-10nm scale in order to turn Lifshitz-van der Waals interactions from attractive to repulsive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time the metallic bodies with more sophisticated shape were studied, and for certain cases Casimir repulsion due to the geometry was predicted in [15]. The repulsion for fluid-separated sphere and plate with ε sph (iξ) < ε f luid (iξ) < ε plate (iξ) was considered in [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%