Vacuolar deposition of recombinant proteins in plant vegetative organs as a strategy to increase yields

Abstract

Delivery of recombinant proteins to vegetative tissue vacuoles was considered inconvenient since this compartment was expected to be hydrolytic; nevertheless there is growing evidence that certain foreign proteins accumulate at high yields in vacuoles. For example avidin, cellulolytic enzymes, endolysin, and transglutaminases were produced at high yields when were sorted to leaf central vacuole avoiding the detrimental effect of these proteins on plant growth. Also, several secretory mammalian proteins such as collagen, a1-proteinase inhibitor, complement-5a, interleukin-6 and immunoglobulins accumulated at higher yields in leaf vacuoles than in the apoplast or cytosol. To reach this final destination, fusions to sequence specific vacuolar sorting signals (ssVSS) typical of proteases or proteinase inhibitors and/or Ct-VSS representative of storage proteins or plant lectins were used and both types of motifs were capable to increase accumulation. Importantly, the type of VSSs or position, either the N or C-terminus, did not alter protein stability, levels or pos-translational modifications. Vacuolar sorted glycoproteins had different type of oligosaccharides indicating that foreign proteins reached the vacuole by 2 different pathways: direct transport from the ER, bypassing the Golgi (high mannose oligosaccharides decorated proteins) or trafficking through the Golgi (Complex oligosaccharide containing proteins). In addition, some glycoproteins lacked of paucimannosidic oligosaccharides suggesting that vacuolar trimming of glycans did not occur. Enhanced accumulation of foreign proteins fused to VSS occurred in several plant species such as tobacco, Nicotiana benthamiana, sugarcane, tomato and in carrot and the obtained results were influenced by plant physiological state. Ten different foreign proteins fused to vacuolar sorting accumulated at higher levels than their apoplastic or cytosolic counterparts. For proteins with cytotoxic effects vacuolar sorted forms yields were superior than ER retained variants, but for other proteins the results were the opposite an there were also examples of similar levels for ER and vacuolar variants. In conclusion vacuolar sorting in vegetative tissues is a satisfactory strategy to enhance protein yields that can be used in several plant species.

Are Phage Lytic Proteins the Secret Weapon To Kill Staphylococcus aureus ?

“…The main advantages of microalgae are low cost, easy upscaling, and the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of several species. Similarly, expression of recombinant proteins in plants is also a feasible alternative ( 72 ).…”

Advances in Plant-Derived Scaffold Proteins

“…However, any individual approach may not produce the same result for each extraction strategy due to the specific characteristics of the recombinant proteins being produced, diversity among plant hosts, and variation in host tissue types. For example, directing recombinant proteins into the plant vacuole can be a useful tool to store recombinant protein secluded from the cytoplasmic enzymes (Marin Viegas et al, 2016). While this method increases recombinant collagen yield (Stein et al, 2009), it results in no detectable yield of recombinant spider silk proteins (Yang et al, 2005).…”

Expression of a Hyperthermophilic Cellobiohydrolase in Transgenic Nicotiana tabacum by Protein Storage Vacuole Targeting

“…It is worth noting that N- and O-linked glycosylation can be critical for stability of certain fungal cellulases [ 46 ], and since these post-translation modifications mainly occur in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus, they cannot be operated on plastid-expressed enzymes. Although delivery of recombinant proteins to LVs was successfully achieved [ 47 ], vacuole sorting of CWDEs was dependent on the development of LVs in each plant tissue [ 38 ]. Control of CWDE-encoding gene expression was attempted by using synthetic promoters induced by ethanol [ 48 ] and β-estradiol [ 49 ] or by endogenous pathogen-induced (e.g., PR-1 (At2g14610), RetOx (AT1G26380)) [ 6 ] and senescence-induced promoters (e.g., SAG12 (AT5G45890)) [ 50 ].…”