2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine-induced T cell-mediated immunity plays a critical role in early protection against pseudorabies virus (suid herpes virus type 1) infection in pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative importance of a vaccine-induced cellmediated immunity (CMI) and the antibody responses in the early protection against a PrV infection has been previously demonstrated (4,23,43). During a viral infection, the neutralizing antibodies can inactivate the free viral particles, but cannot inhibit an intraceullular PrV infection (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relative importance of a vaccine-induced cellmediated immunity (CMI) and the antibody responses in the early protection against a PrV infection has been previously demonstrated (4,23,43). During a viral infection, the neutralizing antibodies can inactivate the free viral particles, but cannot inhibit an intraceullular PrV infection (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During a viral infection, the neutralizing antibodies can inactivate the free viral particles, but cannot inhibit an intraceullular PrV infection (34). The Bianchi group found no clear correlation between the antibody levels (in serum or locally) and levels of disease and virus excretion in vaccinated animals (43). Conceivably, the cell-mediated responses may be a more crucial parameter for the early protection against a viral challenge (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well documented that vaccination induces resistance against virus growth in the oronasal mucosa, consequently reduces the excretion of challenge virus shedding; however, vaccines greatly differ in this respect [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Cellular immune responses were associated with the differing kinetics between the virus excretion of vaccinated and non-vaccinated pigs [4,21,22]. The lower amount of viable virus detected by virus isolation than those detected by qPCR in the vaccinated animals reflects the effect of a local immune response through cytotoxic T cells and interferon production, which reduce ADV replication and shedding [22,23].…”
Section: Copyright: © 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellular immune responses were associated with the differing kinetics between the virus excretion of vaccinated and non-vaccinated pigs [4,21,22]. The lower amount of viable virus detected by virus isolation than those detected by qPCR in the vaccinated animals reflects the effect of a local immune response through cytotoxic T cells and interferon production, which reduce ADV replication and shedding [22,23]. At the same time, no neutralizing activity of the nasal washings was found after ADV challenge [24].…”
Section: Copyright: © 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%