2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.08.21252200
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccine effectiveness after 1st and 2nd dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in long-term care facility residents and healthcare workers – a Danish cohort study

Abstract: Background At the end of 2020, Denmark launched an immunization program against SARS-CoV-2. The Danish health authorities prioritized persons currently living in long-term care facilities (LTCF residents) and frontline healthcare workers (HCW) as the first receivers of vaccination. Here we present preliminary population based vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates in these two target groups. Methods The study was designed as a retrospective registry- and population-based observational cohort study including all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
103
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
18
103
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we found no additional benefit of vaccination in residents with previous natural infection, it remains important to examine the additional benefits provided to older adults by a second dose of vaccine, particularly in the context of new variants of concern, for which immunological data suggest the importance of a second inoculation. [32][33][34] Data from a Danish observational study in long-term care facility residents suggest that a single dose of BNT162b2 is ineffective in preventing infection; 13 however, participants received the second vaccine dose a median of 24 days after the first dose, which, based on our findings, is probably too short a period to capture the protective effects of a single vaccine dose. Two large Spanish studies in longterm care facility residents reported similar single-dose BNT162b2 vaccine effective ness estimates to those reported here; however, these studies have limitations of shorter dosing intervals than used in the UK setting and little or no routine asymptomatic screening.…”
Section: Chadox1 Bnt162b2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we found no additional benefit of vaccination in residents with previous natural infection, it remains important to examine the additional benefits provided to older adults by a second dose of vaccine, particularly in the context of new variants of concern, for which immunological data suggest the importance of a second inoculation. [32][33][34] Data from a Danish observational study in long-term care facility residents suggest that a single dose of BNT162b2 is ineffective in preventing infection; 13 however, participants received the second vaccine dose a median of 24 days after the first dose, which, based on our findings, is probably too short a period to capture the protective effects of a single vaccine dose. Two large Spanish studies in longterm care facility residents reported similar single-dose BNT162b2 vaccine effective ness estimates to those reported here; however, these studies have limitations of shorter dosing intervals than used in the UK setting and little or no routine asymptomatic screening.…”
Section: Chadox1 Bnt162b2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Consequently, trial estimates of vaccine efficacy might not be generalisable to long-term care facility residents because of age-related differences in vaccine-induced immune responses. [7][8][9] Observational data from post-licensure studies in older adults are emerging, [10][11][12] and although a small number of preprint articles have reported on populations in long-term care facilities, [13][14][15][16] the study populations were exclusively vaccinated with BNT162b2 at the manufacturer-recommended dosing interval, and regular asymptomatic screening was rarely done.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first priority groups for vaccinations were residents in long-term care facilities (LTCF) and frontline healthcare workers (HCW). Seven days after the second dose the preliminary vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections were 64% (95% confidence interval (CI); 14-84) and 90% (95% CI; 82-95) in these two groups, respectively [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few data on the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in LTCF residents are available up to date. In a Danish cohort study [26], the adjusted effectiveness against both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases in LTCF residents (n = 39,040; mean age 84 years)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Danish cohort study [26], the adjusted effectiveness against both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases in LTCF residents (n = 39,040; mean age 84 years) was 52% (95% CI: 27-69%) and 64% (95% CI: 14-84%) during the periods of 0-7 and >7 days after the second dose, respectively. Although the present report was not designed nor powered to estimate vaccine effectiveness, the vaccination failure rate against any (asymptomatic or symptomatic) RT-PCR-confirmed infection observed is consistent with the findings of the Danish study [26]. In a recent US study [27], the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in vaccinated (n = 13,048) LTCF residents was 1.0% within 2 weeks after receipt of the second dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%