2021
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10030304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UWB-Printed Rectangular-Based Monopole Antenna for Biological Tissue Analysis

Abstract: This paper presents the design of a printed step-type monopole antenna for biological tissue analysis and medical imaging applications in the microwave frequency range. The design starts from a very simple and widely known rectangular monopole antenna, and different modifications to the antenna geometry are made in order to increase the bandwidth. The antenna dimensions are optimized by means of a parametric analysis of each dimension using a 3-D electromagnetic simulator based on the finite element method. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best way to quantify this effect is to use the so-called System Fidelity Factor (SFF), which is a measurement of the correlation between the transmitted and received pulses. This factor calculates the ratio between the energy of the convolution between the transmitted and received pulses and the energy of each pulse separately [ 26 ]. The SFF is defined as: where t is the time, T S is the transmitted pulse, and R S is the received pulse, which is computed from the standard S 21 parameter (which means that SFF takes into consideration the distortion induced by both antennas).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best way to quantify this effect is to use the so-called System Fidelity Factor (SFF), which is a measurement of the correlation between the transmitted and received pulses. This factor calculates the ratio between the energy of the convolution between the transmitted and received pulses and the energy of each pulse separately [ 26 ]. The SFF is defined as: where t is the time, T S is the transmitted pulse, and R S is the received pulse, which is computed from the standard S 21 parameter (which means that SFF takes into consideration the distortion induced by both antennas).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material selection is crucial for the antenna to work at sub‐6 GHz. In the proposed design, commercially available material copper has been used for making the patch and the ground plate—the following formula calculated the width and length of the radiating patch for the proposed antenna 30 Lpgoodbreak=c2frεitalicreff, εreffgoodbreak=εr+12goodbreak+εr12()11+120.25em()hWp, Wpgoodbreak=c2fc2εr1, where c = speed of light in free space, h = height of the substrate, ε r = relative permittivity of the substrate, ε reff = effective permittivity of the substrate, W p = patch's width, and L p = patch's length.…”
Section: Antenna Design Procedures and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, X-ray mammography is the most widely used medical image method for breast cancer screening and detection. However, this technique shows several drawbacks, such as the need for uncomfortable and painful breast compression, the considerable amount of false-positive tests, especially in young patients with dense breasts, and the use of ionising waves [ 3 , 4 ]. Other current techniques also show significant drawbacks, such as the elevated cost of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which hinders its use for early detection purposes, or the need for the patient to take radioactive compounds for the proper generation of the image with positron emission tomography (PET).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, radar-based systems make use of the return waves coming from the reflections of the different objects to build the images [ 4 ]. The operating frequency range for these systems is usually found between 1 and 10 GHz, which supposes a good trade-off between acceptable precision and enough energy penetrating into the biological tissue [ 3 ]. Whereas tomography techniques can achieve remarkable precision, the image-generation processing usually requires considerable time, even dozens of minutes [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%