2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV Plasmonic Resonance of Aluminum Shallow Pit Arrays

Abstract: The UV plasmonic properties of Al shallow pit arrays (ASPA) are investigated by experimental and simulative methods. ASPA with various periods are fabricated by the hard anodization (HA) technique. The measured reflectance spectra of ASPA exhibit a reflectance pit in the UV region, which is red shifted with the increasing period of ASPA and refractive index of the surrounding medium. The dependence of reflectance on the period and refractive index calculated by the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The free Pt ions in solution tend to reduce and grow based on existing atoms to form platinum clusters. [ 26 ] For the pure MnO 2 , the Mn 2p 3/2 two peaks binding energy at 642.27 and 642.89 eV, corresponding to Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ , [ 27 ] the proportions are 46.03% and 53.97%, respectively, while 62.88% and 37.12% for Pt AC ‐MnO 2 (Figure S10a, Supporting Information). The AOS of Mn on the catalyst surface could be calculated by the following formula: AOS = 8.956–1.126 Δ E , where Δ E represents the difference of the binding energy between the two peaks of Mn 3s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free Pt ions in solution tend to reduce and grow based on existing atoms to form platinum clusters. [ 26 ] For the pure MnO 2 , the Mn 2p 3/2 two peaks binding energy at 642.27 and 642.89 eV, corresponding to Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ , [ 27 ] the proportions are 46.03% and 53.97%, respectively, while 62.88% and 37.12% for Pt AC ‐MnO 2 (Figure S10a, Supporting Information). The AOS of Mn on the catalyst surface could be calculated by the following formula: AOS = 8.956–1.126 Δ E , where Δ E represents the difference of the binding energy between the two peaks of Mn 3s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that density functional theory calculations have been already reported to characterize the interactions between BMI.PF6 IL and Ru@Pt model nanoclusters. [26] The metal-metal distances calculated from the XRD diffractogram of isolated Ru@Pt NPs are shifted, as compared to pure metals (Figure S3). The obtained diffractograms match with the one, which has been simulated for Ru@Pt (Figure S3) rather that with the one calculated for Pt/Ru alloy and the monometallic Pt+Ru aggregate mixture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in all the cases the NPs were aligned and the size distributions were more homogeneous, NPs of different sizes still coexist. In the literature, one of the most successful approaches for the ordering of NPs has been the use of Al nanostructured templates composed by shallow pit arrays 43 . These substrates are produced by anodized aluminium oxide, commonly known as alumina, that has been widely used for many applications 44 and nanostructures manufacturing 45,46 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%