2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-006-0050-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV, latitude, and spatial trends in prostate cancer mortality: All sunlight is not the same (United States)

Abstract: Our analyses confirm and extend our findings that the geographic distribution of prostate cancer mortality is the inverse of that of UV radiation. This effect is strongest in counties north of 40 degrees N latitude, where vitamin D synthesis is limited to non-winter months. These findings add additional support for the hypothesis that vitamin D insufficiency increases risk for prostate cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
64
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the papers identifying cancer risk factors, we wish to highlight the following: i) the association between arsenic concentration in drinkable water and colon, lung and bladder cancer's incidence risk increase in Cordoba, Argentina (Aballay et al, 2012); ii) a relation between higher incidence and mortality rates by cervical cancer, and more poverty and/or higher distance to screening in USA (Horner et al, 2011); iii) the urban disadvantage in risk of breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancers in Illinois (McLafferty and Wang, 2009); or iv) a relation between Vitamin D insufficiency and an increase of prostate cancer risk (Schwartz and Hanchette, 2006); v) a possible association among coal mining activities and cancer mortality in West Virginia (Hendryx et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methods Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the papers identifying cancer risk factors, we wish to highlight the following: i) the association between arsenic concentration in drinkable water and colon, lung and bladder cancer's incidence risk increase in Cordoba, Argentina (Aballay et al, 2012); ii) a relation between higher incidence and mortality rates by cervical cancer, and more poverty and/or higher distance to screening in USA (Horner et al, 2011); iii) the urban disadvantage in risk of breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancers in Illinois (McLafferty and Wang, 2009); or iv) a relation between Vitamin D insufficiency and an increase of prostate cancer risk (Schwartz and Hanchette, 2006); v) a possible association among coal mining activities and cancer mortality in West Virginia (Hendryx et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methods Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major source of vitamin D is casual exposure to sunlight, which accounts for f90% of serum levels of 25(OH)D, the main circulating metabolite of vitamin D (3). In the United States, prostate cancer mortality rates are inversely correlated with solar radiation levels, with the highest rates found in the Northeast (4,5). Recently, several studies reported inverse associations with prostate cancer risk in relation to residential sun exposure (6), self-reported sun exposure (7), a sun exposure index based on skin pigmentation measurements (8), serum levels of 25(OH)D (9,10), and composite score based on multiple predictors of serum levels of 25(OH)D (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecologic studies support an inverse association between sunlight exposure and incidence of prostate cancer (1)(2)(3). Because sun exposure is the major source of human vitamin D production, several authors have hypothesized that the link between reduced prostate cancer incidence and increased sun exposure may be increased vitamin D levels (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%