Plants and UV-B 1997
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511752346.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV-B perception and signal transduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that failure to repair UV photoproducts induced by lowfluence, short-wavelength UV-B radiation from the incubator lamps led to an accumulation of DNA damage over the 26 d of pretreatment growth that activated resistance in the mutants deficient in both photoreactivation and NER. In wild-type plants, UV-B-induced expression of genes characteristic of stress responses is associated with high fluence rates, whereas low fluence rates are linked to metabolic and developmental changes (Frohnmeyer and Staiger, 2003;Stratmann, 2003;Suesslin and Frohnmeyer, 2003;Ulm and Nagy, 2005;Jenkins and Brown, 2007). Although fluence rate plays a substantial role in determining UV-B responses, our results suggest the capacity of the plant to repair DNA damage may be an important factor in determining the type(s) of response elicited by different fluence rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This suggests that failure to repair UV photoproducts induced by lowfluence, short-wavelength UV-B radiation from the incubator lamps led to an accumulation of DNA damage over the 26 d of pretreatment growth that activated resistance in the mutants deficient in both photoreactivation and NER. In wild-type plants, UV-B-induced expression of genes characteristic of stress responses is associated with high fluence rates, whereas low fluence rates are linked to metabolic and developmental changes (Frohnmeyer and Staiger, 2003;Stratmann, 2003;Suesslin and Frohnmeyer, 2003;Ulm and Nagy, 2005;Jenkins and Brown, 2007). Although fluence rate plays a substantial role in determining UV-B responses, our results suggest the capacity of the plant to repair DNA damage may be an important factor in determining the type(s) of response elicited by different fluence rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Speculations ranged from the existence of distinct UV-B perception linked to a regulatory molecular signaling pathway to that no UV-B-dedicated photosensory mechanism existed at all and UV-B-induced changes in secondary metabolism lead to the observed UV-B photomorphogenesis (Björn 1999, Jansen 2002, Frohnmeyer and Staiger 2003, Ulm and Nagy 2005, Ulm 2006, Jenkins and Brown 2007. With identification of UVR8 as the UV-B photoreceptor, a new era has begun regarding our understanding of plant UV-B responses, and the relationship of UV-B to plant photomorphogenesis in general.…”
Section: Perception Of Uv-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low levels of UV-B radiation cause certain photomorphogenic responses, including inhibition of hypocotyl elongation and root growth [2]. These UV-B photomorphogenic responses are mechanistically different from UV-B damage responses and are believed to be mediated by a UV-B-specific photoreceptor [3,4]. Recently, a UV-B photoreceptor has been identified in Arabidopsis, i.e., the β-propeller protein UV RESISTANCE LOCUS8 (UVR8) signaling through a pathway that involves the basic zipper (bZIP) transcription factor ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL5 (HY5) and the E3 ubiquitin ligase CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTO-MORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%