1986
DOI: 10.1002/jhrc.1240090806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of the Sadtler standard RI system in micropollution analyses

Abstract: SummaryDuring the development of a GC retention index library very rigorous standard parameters were used in the SADTLER laboratories. Because most chromatographers presumably have their "favourite" and well-proven columns a study has been carried out on how to make use of them for standard index generation. Variables such as column geometry, split ratio, and film thickness were examined and the calculated indices were compared to some "basic" values. Splitless and cool on-column injection techniques were also… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2a), but there are some differences between both chromatograms. On the TIC chromatogram there seems to (2001); (2) Hayes and Pitzer (1985); (3) prediction using the method of Zenkevich (1998); (4) HaagenSmit Laboratory (1997); (5) Laub and Purmell (1988); (6) Lubeck and Sutton (1984); (7) Helmig et al (1996); (8) Bermejo et al (1987); (9) Andrade et al (2000); (10) (2000); (15) Madruga and Mottram (1998); (16) Weber (1986) be a band 0.4 s above the lowermost band (i.e. the alkane band).…”
Section: Gc×gc Chromatogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a), but there are some differences between both chromatograms. On the TIC chromatogram there seems to (2001); (2) Hayes and Pitzer (1985); (3) prediction using the method of Zenkevich (1998); (4) HaagenSmit Laboratory (1997); (5) Laub and Purmell (1988); (6) Lubeck and Sutton (1984); (7) Helmig et al (1996); (8) Bermejo et al (1987); (9) Andrade et al (2000); (10) (2000); (15) Madruga and Mottram (1998); (16) Weber (1986) be a band 0.4 s above the lowermost band (i.e. the alkane band).…”
Section: Gc×gc Chromatogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5.38) was demonstrated with experimentally found (T Char ,q Char ) pairs for about 200 solutes and two types of stationary phase polymers [11,64,71]. The database was compiled from published thermodynamic data [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][64][65][66] and from experimental results developed by the software vendor [74]. A large database of thermodynamic parameters of solute-liquid interaction in GC is compiled in commercial Pro ezGC software [73] covering more than 3000 soluteseach in several liquid polymers widely used for making stationary phases in GC columns [74].…”
Section: Fixed Dimensionless Film Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…2a), but there are some differences between both chromatograms. On the TIC chromatogram there seems to Hayes and Pitzer (1985); (3) prediction using the method of Zenkevich ( 1998 16) Weber (1986) be a band 0.4 s above the lowermost band (i.e. the alkane band).…”
Section: Gc×gc Chromatogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%