1963
DOI: 10.1093/jn/79.1.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of Alfalfa Carotene and Vitamin a by Growing Chicks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented justify in not concluding from their data whether the increased pigmentation of egg yolks due to EQ was caused by improved stability of xanthophyll in the digestive tract and blood stream or during storage of the feed. Moreover, these results are similar to those of Parrish et al (1963), who reported that this antioxidant did not improve carotene utilization from alfalfa meal. On the other hand, Anjaneylu et al (1963) attributed significant biological activity to EQ with regard to egg yolk pigmentation, counteracting a 10% to 20% in vivo loss.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented justify in not concluding from their data whether the increased pigmentation of egg yolks due to EQ was caused by improved stability of xanthophyll in the digestive tract and blood stream or during storage of the feed. Moreover, these results are similar to those of Parrish et al (1963), who reported that this antioxidant did not improve carotene utilization from alfalfa meal. On the other hand, Anjaneylu et al (1963) attributed significant biological activity to EQ with regard to egg yolk pigmentation, counteracting a 10% to 20% in vivo loss.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our observation that XU from good quality alfalfa does not appear to differ from that of inferior alfalfa (Table 5), corresponds to the results of Parrish et al (1963) with regard to the availability of carotene from high and low quality alfalfa meal, and those of Bartov and Bornstein (unpublished data) as far as XU from high and low quality com is concerned.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Bartov and Bornstein (1966) did not observe any significant difference in xanthophyll utilization of properly stored and adversely stored alfalfa meal samples prepared from the same source. Parrish et al (1963) did not observe any difference in (3-carotene utilization from alfalfa meals having high or low carotene content, and Hall et al (1966) obtained the same xanthophyll utilization from four different dehydrated alfalfa meals even though their xanthophyll contents ranged from 175 to 401 mg/kg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%