Utilização do modelo FPEEEA (OMS) para a análise dos riscos relacionados ao uso de agrotóxicos em atividades agrícolas do estado do Rio de Janeiro

Araújo-Pinto, Mariana de; Peres, Frederico; Moreira, Josino Costa

doi:10.1590/s1413-81232012000600018

Cited by 17 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Governmental mediated control can be applied at any scale from international to local. That enforcement in frontiers is by definition less effective might argue for a stronger control upstream-that is stronger international, national and statelevel control on the production, distribution, use and disposal of agrochemicals [41]. At local level, the enforcement of national legislation could be effective through well-equipped and trained local governmental employees (e.g.…”

Section: (A) Improve Regulation and Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pesticide use and biodiversity conservation in the Amazonian agricultural frontier

Schiesari

Waichman

Brock

et al. 2013

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agricultural frontiers are dynamic environments characterized by the conversion of native habitats to agriculture. Because they are currently concentrated in diverse tropical habitats, agricultural frontiers are areas where the largest number of species is exposed to hazardous land management practices, including pesticide use. Focusing on the Amazonian frontier, we show that producers have varying access to resources, knowledge, control and reward mechanisms to improve land management practices. With poor education and no technical support, pesticide use by smallholders sharply deviated from agronomical recommendations, tending to overutilization of hazardous compounds. By contrast, with higher levels of technical expertise and resources, and aiming at more restrictive markets, large-scale producers adhered more closely to technical recommendations and even voluntarily replaced more hazardous compounds. However, the ecological footprint increased significantly over time because of increased dosage or because formulations that are less toxic to humans may be more toxic to other biodiversity. Frontier regions appear to be unique in terms of the conflicts between production and conservation, and the necessary pesticide risk management and risk reduction can only be achieved through responsibility-sharing by diverse stakeholders, including governmental and intergovernmental organizations, NGOs, financial institutions, pesticide and agricultural industries, producers, academia and consumers.

show abstract

Section: (A) Improve Regulation and Controlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pesticide use and biodiversity conservation in the Amazonian agricultural frontier

Schiesari

Waichman

Brock

et al. 2013

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…De ARAUJO-PINTO et al (2012) in their research sought to identify the main risks to the health of farm workers and the environment associated with pesticide use in the Rio de Janeiro state -Brazil, based on analysis of official public documents and literature review applying force model driving-Pressure-State-Exposure-EffectAction (DPSEEA) of the World Health Organization (WHO). They evaluated family farming in the mountain region and the monoculture of sugarcane in the plains.…”

Section: Rural Workers' Health and The Use Of Pesticides In Developinmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They found in the discourse of managers and farmers the belief that pesticides are essential to agricultural productivity and do not generate impacts on health and the environment and identified no development of surveillance actions of pesticide use. The authors concluded that there is need to develop a model of sustainable agriculture, healthy and pesticide free and that organized society and the responsible institutions must build actions that meet the interests of the population living work in the field or consuming products harvested there, especially controlling risks and repercussions that can and should be avoided.De ARAUJO-PINTO et al (2012) in their research sought to identify the main risks to the health of farm workers and the environment associated with pesticide use in the Rio de Janeiro state -Brazil, based on analysis of official public documents and literature review applying force model driving-Pressure-State-Exposure-EffectAction (DPSEEA) of the World Health Organization (WHO). They evaluated family farming in the mountain region and the monoculture of sugarcane in the plains.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Rural workers` health related to the use of pesticides in developing and developed countries

Coelho

2017

Revista Vértices

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review aims to examine the issue rural workers' health and the use of pesticides in its various aspects, especially emphasizing how that is doing in developing and developed countries. We found than the rural workers pesticide contamination problems occur both in developing countries as in developed countries. We concluded than to ensure the rural workers' health when they use pesticides becomes necessary to increase the training of workers. It is also important to build political agendas and actions in the health of agricultural workers, with implementation of preventive health programs with greater oversight and monitoring on pesticide use. IntroductionThe indiscriminate application of pesticides affects both human health and natural ecosystems. The use of pesticides in agriculture can be justified by the need to increase agricultural production, but behind the use of these substances are the risks of occupational diseases confirmed by studies that focus primarily on specific types of substances (SILVA & SADI, 2006). The epidemiology of the use of pesticides in agriculture should be seen not only in terms of consumers, but in view of occupational hazard among farmers or rural workers. DOI: 10.19180/1809DOI: 10.19180/ -2667 In general, there is a false thought that in the developed countries there is no problem related to poisoning of farm workers by pesticides. According to the "Centers for Disease Artigo de RevisãoControl and Prevention" of the United States, agriculture is the most dangerous industry for American workers, affecting mainly the younger ones. It was found that 76% of agricultural workers suffered fatal accident were under 16 years and worked in an agricultural family business that was exempt from child labor laws (CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION. NIOSH, 2003).Pesticides have been widely used to control pests and diseases related to agriculture, fisheries, forestry and food industry. Throughout history it was necessary to create laws that establish safety rules regarding the use of pesticides in order to reduce their impact on the environment and the health of farm workers. Leaflet and label are examples of this and are the main sources of information for rural workers, helping to prevent accidents and consequently poisoning (ZAMBRONE & CORREA, 2008).This review aims to examine the issue rural workers' health and the use of pesticides in its various aspects, especially emphasizing how that is doing in developing and developed countries. MetodologyWe utilized the site periodic capes (www.periodicos.capes.gov.br) and the key words utilized were: "segurança and agrotóxico" and "rural work and pesticide". The time was the last 10 years. We found 75 citations and selected 35 than talked about rural workers` health related to the use of pesticides. These 35 citations, 14 were in Portuguese language: 11 papers, 1 dissertation, 1 book and 1 technical bulletin and 21 were in English language: 18 papers, 2 books and 1 technical bulletin. We found mainly citations of the last five years (...

show abstract

“…For each of these dimensions, indicators are constructed that favor a more complete understanding of environmental health status and lead to proposals for actions for each of the elements of the system. (1) Cancer is a multifactorial disease resulting from a combination of genetic, environmental and behavioral factors acting simultaneously and successively. A substantial proportion of all cancers are attributable to the environment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Para cada uma destas dimensões são construídos indicadores que favorecem o entendimento mais integral do status da saúde ambiental e conduzem a propostas de ações para cada um dos elementos do sistema. (1) O cancro é uma doença multifatorial resultante de uma combinação de fatores genéticos, ambientais e comportamentais agindo simultânea e sucessivamente. Uma proporção substancial de todos os cancros é atribuível ao ambiente.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Panel of Environmental Health Indicators for Oncological Diseases

Nunes

Estudante²,

Justo³

2017

BBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

8 Biomedical and Biopharmaceutical Research J o r n a l d e I n v e s t i g a ç ã o B i o m é d i c a e B i o f a r m a c ê u t i c a Panel of evironmental health indicators for oncological diseases Painel de indicadores de saúde ambiental para doenças oncológicasKeywords: DPSEEA, indicators, oncology, environmental health, public health. ResumoEm Portugal o cancro é a primeira causa de morte prematura e a segunda em todas as idades. Mundialmente a proporção de casos de cancro atribuíveis a fatores de risco modificáveis excede um terço dos mesmos. Estes são casos evitáveis. O modelo de organização de indicadores de saúde ambiental DPSEEA: Força Motriz-Pressão-Situação-Exposição-Efeito-Ação simplifica a descrição e a análise das relações entre desenvolvimento, ambiente e saúde, visando auxiliar a tomada de decisões. Através de uma pesquisa aplicada, descritiva e documental elaborou-se um quadro de 18 indicadores alicerçado no modelo DPSEEA, visando a leitura da situação e evolução da saúde ambiental em Portugal com impacto na área das doenças oncológicas.Foram consultados os sites de 41 entidades e identificados 81 indicadores. A seleção dos 18 indicadores mais adequados, 3 por cada dimensão do modelo, foi efetuada através dum painel de 21 peritos, organizados de forma aleatória e estratificada por áreas de formação. Os indicadores foram classificados numa escala de Likert quanto à validez, solidez, relevância, sensibilidade e qualidade estatística. Estatisticamente as diferenças nas pontuações observadas para os diferentes indicadores em todas as dimensões são significativas e o conjunto de 3 indicadores escolhidos para cada dimensão é igualmente relevante em 95% dos mesmos (p<0,05).Palavras-chave: DPSEEA, indicadores, oncologia, saúde ambiental, saúde pública.

show abstract

Utilização do modelo FPEEEA (OMS) para a análise dos riscos relacionados ao uso de agrotóxicos em atividades agrícolas do estado do Rio de Janeiro

Cited by 17 publications

References 17 publications

Pesticide use and biodiversity conservation in the Amazonian agricultural frontier

Pesticide use and biodiversity conservation in the Amazonian agricultural frontier

Rural workers` health related to the use of pesticides in developing and developed countries

Panel of Environmental Health Indicators for Oncological Diseases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About