2009
DOI: 10.4321/s0004-05922009000400009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilização do farelo de canola em dietas para suínos em crescimento e terminação

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are similar to those obtained by Zanotto et al (2009), who found no effect of the inclusion level of CM on the DWG and DFI, suggesting that CM can replace up to 40% of soybean meal in diets for growing pigs. However, the current results are different to those reported by Moreira et al (1995), which indicated that the inclusion of CM (0, 40, 80 and 120 g/kg) did not affect the DFI, but reduced the DWG and had a quadratic effect on FGR, and concluded that the level of 84.4 g/kg CM was the best at an early stage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The results of this study are similar to those obtained by Zanotto et al (2009), who found no effect of the inclusion level of CM on the DWG and DFI, suggesting that CM can replace up to 40% of soybean meal in diets for growing pigs. However, the current results are different to those reported by Moreira et al (1995), which indicated that the inclusion of CM (0, 40, 80 and 120 g/kg) did not affect the DFI, but reduced the DWG and had a quadratic effect on FGR, and concluded that the level of 84.4 g/kg CM was the best at an early stage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As rações foram calculadas de modo a serem isoenergéticas, isoprotéicas, isolisínicas, isocalcíticas e isofosfóricas. Por causa do alto teor de proteína do farelo estudado, o qual se assemelha ao teor de proteína do farelo de soja, foi calculada a relação peso do FA42 com o peso do farelo de soja (FS) e a relação proteína bruta do FA42 com a proteína do FS nas rações experimentais (Tabela 1), conforme a metodologia proposta por Zanotto et al (2009 0,40 0,40 0,40 0,40 0,40 0,40 0,40 0,40 L-lisina HCl -0,05 0,10 0,15 -0,05 0,10 0,15 Aditivo promotor de crescimento 2 0,10 0,10 0,10 0,10 0,10 0,10 0,10 0,10 foram avaliados o consumo diário de ração, ganho diário de peso e conversão alimentar de cada unidade experimental. Adicionalmente, para cada animal, no final das fases foi medida a espessura de toucinho e profundidade de lombo na posição P2, por meio do aparelho Sono-Grader (Renco®) e coletadas amostras de sangue, via veia cava cranial, conforme metodologia preconizada por Cai et al (1994).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Valores analisados com base nas metodologias preconizadas por AOAC (1995); 4 Valores analisados com base na metodologia descrita porHenderson & Perry (1955);5 Valores calculados com base nos valores propostos porPaiano et al (2006); 6 Valores calculados com base na metodologia proposta porZanotto et al (2009).…”
unclassified