2007
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of telephone assessments in an older adult population.

Abstract: Telephone assessments are commonly used in mental health research and may be especially beneficial in older populations. The current study assessed the psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (T. J. Meyer, M. L. Miller, R. L. Metzger, & T. D. Borkovec, 1990) and the Beck Depression Inventory--II (A. T. Beck, R. A. Steer, & G. K. Brown, 1996), when administered over the telephone in an older adult population. Results indicate no differences in mean symptom level or internal consistency acr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(64 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychometric properties for telephone-based assessment instruments were comparable to in-person versions. 39 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Psychometric properties for telephone-based assessment instruments were comparable to in-person versions. 39 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In future studies, it will be important to examine the impact of treatment delivered by providers without specialized CBT expertise. Improved integration with ongoing care would be facilitated through use of an EMR to identify patients and communicate with providers, 39 and collaborative models of care that incorporate both CBT and medication need to be tested.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were provided with blank copies of the self-report measures with which to follow along during the telephone assessment and received a $20 gift card upon completion. Data from an overlapping sample suggest comparable psychometric properties for telephone-administered and in-person instruments (Senior, et al, 2007). …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, while many researchers suggest that the use of telephone-based evaluations produce results that are comparable to face-to-face administration [6, 7, 1117], others question the reliability and validity of some applications of telephone-based data collection [25]. Senior and colleagues [26] have recently discussed this concern specifically related to patient self-report measures, and found that telephone-administered follow-up does adequately correlate with in-person interviews for two commonly used depression and anxiety self-reports. Furthermore, they surmise that additional benefits provided by telephone assessments include facilitating a more diverse patient population and once again providing a more beneficial cost-effectiveness model for clinical research [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Senior and colleagues [26] have recently discussed this concern specifically related to patient self-report measures, and found that telephone-administered follow-up does adequately correlate with in-person interviews for two commonly used depression and anxiety self-reports. Furthermore, they surmise that additional benefits provided by telephone assessments include facilitating a more diverse patient population and once again providing a more beneficial cost-effectiveness model for clinical research [26]. We believe that telephone-based assessments provide the best chance for minimizing missing data, a common problem in longitudinal depression studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%