2003
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.05.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Routine Psychological Screening in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Clinic

Abstract: Results demonstrate that routine psychological screening can be successfully integrated into the cancer survivor clinic and may be effective in identifying those survivors with significant distress who require further evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference in age distribution may have confounded PCS and MCS scores. To explore any if such confounding, we conducted an additional analysis in which we excluded survivors of age [16][17] and found that these findings were similar (results not shown) to the findings reported in this paper. This suggests that this type of confounding should be minimal.…”
Section: Study Limitationssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This difference in age distribution may have confounded PCS and MCS scores. To explore any if such confounding, we conducted an additional analysis in which we excluded survivors of age [16][17] and found that these findings were similar (results not shown) to the findings reported in this paper. This suggests that this type of confounding should be minimal.…”
Section: Study Limitationssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Some reports have cited that dissatisfaction with physical appearance, poor physical health and treatment with cranial radiation were associated with psychological distress (14). Cranial radiotherapy, causing a specific pattern of cognitive and educational sequelae, is associated with suicidal ideation (15). The third patient, who was regularly followed at the outpatient clinic for late effects, was in perfect health with no complaints 19 months prior to death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43 The SIP and the SF-36 have proven to be reliable and valid instruments, and have been used in a wide variety of patient populations, including patients with cancer. [44][45][46][47][48] The SIP focuses on the impact of an illness as reported by the patient, and contains 136 items in 12 categories, from which three additional aggregate scores can be calculated ('physical dimension', 'psychosocial dimension', and 'total score'). SIP scores are presented as percentages of maximal dysfunction ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating higher level of dysfunction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%